Yesterday Kerry testified before the House that there would be no need to present this “historic agreement” before the senate for examination, debate and ratification. Why not? If not ratified by the Senate, the American government is not legally bound by its provisions. Also if the deal is so good why wouldn’t Kerry want it publicly examined and debated? Four ears ago there was a bipartisan consensus that the mad mullahs of Iran should never be permitted to obtain nuclear weapons. Obama apparently changed his mind or always thought otherwise.
...there was a point where this guy finally realized he'd made a bad deal, and it was NOT better than no deal at all.
Iran is whooping our fag leader around just as moochelle does.