[Ohioan]

It is offensive to all people of British descent that a Yemenite Arab is called a “Briton.”

It is probably offensive to the Yemenite, also. The confusion of geography with ethnicity, has been too carefully orchestrated to be purely accidental. It fits the pursuers of world government's efforts to pretend that people are interchangeable too nicely to be accidental. The way that the Left in Academia immediately adopts all changes in nomenclature, which point in such direction, clearly demonstrates that it is not accidental.

Note, when was the last time that you saw or heard a prominent Leftist ideologue refer to England or Great Britain as a "mother country."

Much of the youth is being systematically indoctrinated with the cloud-borne fantasies of the Left, and this word game is part of the pattern.

To understand what is really involved in the make-believe world of human interchangeability, and the direct threat to national sovereignty, see Surrender By Subterfuge.

We have been losing the fight for reality for over half a century.

[jonatron]

Nowadays, there are often glaring grammatical errors in mainstream news articles, then at the bottom, there is a picture of the 20 or 30-something hipster journalist often making me wonder who and where the editor is. There is, however, a consistent application of politically-correct term usage and uniformity of Newspeak throughout the mainstream media. It seems the editors are more focused on the agenda and filtering out the heretics.

Thank you for the link. This one sentence says a great deal:
The great paradox is that those who believe that the nations of the earth cannot be trusted not to destroy one another, seem to believe that their peoples may somehow be merged to mutual benefit.