There would be some executive action creating a new law that should bring about impeachment, but since the Republicans have a majority that is castrated there will be no action.
I checked into an el paso,tx hospital yesterday, since being here one day, I have heard large families of illegals in my shared room telling the patient from their family, dont tell the hospital you have any money. No one has to pay for service anymore..the hospital is run over..I also heard a hospital administrator say they could not afford this onslaught of patients.. OUr country is gone..
Be aware of the campaign of manipulation being waged.
Watch for references to Obama’s “signature health law”. This is to personalize it, to make it about Obama. This is preparation to leveling charges of “hating Obama” and of course “racism”. Whether or not it is any person’s “signature” law is utterly irrelevant. Irrelevant except for those who wish to set the stage for attacking the motives of the plaintiffs.
Another tactic is claiming that a ruling for the plaintiffs would “could cost states billions and billions of dollars”. The subsidies are not a cost to the state or to the recipients of the subsidy. The cost is to federal taxpayers who are funding the illegal subsidy. A ruling for the plaintiffs would save taxpayers billions and billions of dollars.
These are both to generate a political climate, to intimidate the court.
This case is the most black and white case to hit the Supremes in the last decade.
Does the law mean what the words of the law say? Or, does the law have to be re-interpreted by the SC to say what it does not say?
I have long felt that we are past the turning point, and that from here there is no recovery of our nation - and daily the new news on what O and his mind-numbed robots are doing only confirm this, drop-by-drop-by-drop.
But if the SC re-writes this law as our Chief Justice did the last one, it is indeed over.
The only question left is to leave the land. Or something I dare not say..........
Obama will ignore any court ruling. Who’s going to stop him?
The question is whether or not Roberts is bought and paid for again like he was in the one defining the penalty as a tax when they kept saying it was not a tax until it went to court.
I’m afraid the corruption is on par with Mexico’s corruption now. This president and his administration has brought the country to its knees.
I guess we will soon find out what we are made of nowadays.
The root cause is popular election of senator rather than each states representative s.
The SC will not focus on what the law says, it will look at how the country would be harmed financially if they don’t rule in favor of O-Ahole. They won’t care about how the country will be harmed Constitutionally. They have already proven that with their first ruling on Obamacare.
That will be their primary concern and hence, they will rule to change the law. It’s a given.
But if were to get rid of ObamaCare, and go back to the way it was...
It will be a disaster for our country!
Can someone please explain this logic???
Now we’re “finding out what is in it”, thanks to the Fools on the Hill who passed it. We are also finding out how many holes it takes to fill the U.S. Congress and Senate. I hope that one day there will be a day of reckoning for those who are turning this country into a banana republic.
Well we know all the illegals will be getting refund checks from the IRS to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars so the hospitals should do some collecting
The soap box failed to stop Obamacare. The ballot box failed to stop Obamacare. The Supreme Court represents the jury box, and I pray it will stop Obamacare. I’ve heard there is a fourth option. I hope the Supremes will rule in accordance with the law and we will not have to find out how that final option goes.
Hire Max Smart and Agent99.
There’s being “uninsured” and there’s getting “health care”.....such a joke oCare is....sick joke
My understanding is that if SCOTUS strikes down the subsidies they’ll need, legally, to end. Immediately. There’s no legal means to effect the kind of “soft landing” the article suggests as a possibility.
That doesn’t mean that this Administration won’t use another EO to effect such a soft landing. And spend money on it that hasn’t been appropriated for just such purposes.
On top of that, I also think that the subsidies that have been provided must, legally, be repaid. Since the subsidies went to people of low income who needed them to obtain health insurance, the chances of most of them being able to repay are somewhere between slim and none.
So yes, this is going to create chaos. And in doing so will show Obamacare to be the typical Progressive house of cards ...
dot dot dash dash dot dot dot...message to SCOTUS....do not strike this down or you will induce CHAOS!....dot dot dash dot dot dash....