Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Ronald Reagan ran today, where would he fall on the conservative spectrum?
Washington Post ^ | february 25, 2015

Posted on 02/25/2015 10:01:01 AM PST by detective

When conservatives gather Thursday for their annual confab there will be homages to Ronald Reagan everywhere. He’ll be mentioned in speeches, he’ll show up as a life-size cardboard cutout, and on posters and buttons. The event’s big dinner is in his name.

At the Conservative Political Action Conference, Reagan is king. And the many Republicans vying to be president will work feverishly to align with him. But do they?

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cpac; reagan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last
To: entropy12

“Reagan would be considered a RINO today.”
_____________

And if it was found out that he regulalry had cocktails with Tip O’Neil, I think FR would be calling for impeachment.


81 posted on 02/25/2015 2:40:58 PM PST by Regal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

JFK ordered the Bay of Pigs attack and then withdrew air support and let them get slaughtered, his incompetence then led to us to facing nuclear war during his blockade as he made Castro’s Cuba permanent and then starting the Vietnam war, and of course instead of tearing down the Berlin Wall, they built it during the disastrous Kennedy years.

He made Jimmy Carter look like a foreign policy whiz kid.


82 posted on 02/25/2015 2:42:29 PM PST by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Rides_A_Red_Horse
I bet you love your Jeb and Cristy!

You are wrong again. Jeb will make the worst president in the republican field. I have only 2 preferences right now, Walker & Cruz. I am also Ok with Jindal & Kasich. That's it!

83 posted on 02/25/2015 2:42:33 PM PST by entropy12 (Real function of economists is to make astrologers look respectable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Stupid question. We don’t live in a vacuum. Issues change, people learn, and positions mature. The issues Ronald Reagan supported today would likely be different from the issues he supported 35 years ago. As those issues were different from the ones he supported 35 years before that.

All true. It doesn't stop people from asking the question though, even when it comes to long-dead figures like Jefferson, Lincoln, FDR, and JFK. It's more a way of making a political argument than a serious attempt to answer unanswerable questions.

84 posted on 02/25/2015 2:45:37 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Regal

Indeed. Reagan was lucky there was no FR to call him a RINO having cocktails with Tip O’Neill and giving in to all the democrat spending bills.

Can you imagine if Walker or Cruz came out for instant amnesty to all illegals in the country like Reagan did? Can you imagine the flames?


85 posted on 02/25/2015 2:46:05 PM PST by entropy12 (Real function of economists is to make astrologers look respectable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Regal

Do you realize how silly that sounds to the many of us here that know that he had cocktails with Tip O’Neil and were voting for him and consider him our conservative hero today?

You think that freepers don’t know Reagan?

For a new guy, perhaps you should pay a little more attention to where you are at, before you post such silly statements.


86 posted on 02/25/2015 2:46:12 PM PST by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

What will you do if Jeb or Cristy become the candidate in the general election?


87 posted on 02/25/2015 2:47:00 PM PST by Rides_A_Red_Horse (Why do you need a fire extinguisher when you can call the fire department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

You pretty much summed up what I think of president Reagan.

I admire him for winning the cold war, and on his watch inflation was tamed and 22 million jobs were created. I made lots of money in the stock market during 8 years of Reagan. Reagan did a great job of improving America’s stature in the world. Overall a very good president.

But he was not all pure. Many here want to put their blinders on for his Amnesty to 3 million illegals. That encouraged more illegals to flood in. Even more than that, I was upset about his reaching deals with the democrat congress on spending. Spending tripled, but tax revenues doubled during his 8 years.


88 posted on 02/25/2015 2:52:13 PM PST by entropy12 (Real function of economists is to make astrologers look respectable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

“You think that freepers don’t know Reagan?”
____

Nothing has changed about Reagan, but conservative tolerance for anything Democrat or even RINO has been wholly eliminated from discourse.

Every day of the week you can read anti-RINO, anti-GOPe threads here on FR, despite Reagan’s 11th Commandment.

Reagan had far more tolerance for those who were not purists than exist in the party today. I believe in today’s climnate Reagan would get a lot of grief for that.


89 posted on 02/25/2015 2:56:31 PM PST by Regal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: detective

Growth of government spending by president:

Carter (1976–1980) 394.7 to 649.7; 64.6 percent in 4 years

Reagan (1980–1988) 649.7 to 1143.8; 76.1 percent in 8 years

Bush I (1988–1992) 1143.8 to 1484.3; 29.8 percent in 4 years

Clinton (1992–2000) 1484.3 to 1942.5; 30.9 percent in 8 years

Bush II (2000–2008) 1942.5 to 3219.8; 65.8 percent in 8 years

http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/growth-rates-in-government-spending-by-president/


90 posted on 02/25/2015 3:00:15 PM PST by entropy12 (Real function of economists is to make astrologers look respectable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Regal

Post of the day! Well said!!


91 posted on 02/25/2015 3:01:49 PM PST by entropy12 (Real function of economists is to make astrologers look respectable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Regal

Welcome to freerepublic, I’m guessing that since you are spewing the liberal anti-conservative lines and attacking freerepubic as being anti-Reagan, that you are a retread.

Reagan isn’t a theory to us, we know Reagan, we supported Reagan, voted for Reagan, many of us served under Reagan, and we like Reagan.

Here you new to the forum and already lecturing us on being too conservative and too purist, today Reagan would be allied with Palin and Cruz and the other conservatives, just as he was in the old days.

Reagan was from the right wing of the GOP and was hated by the rinos.


92 posted on 02/25/2015 3:02:07 PM PST by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Don’t you ever get tired of you liberal trolling?


93 posted on 02/25/2015 3:02:45 PM PST by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

” I’m guessing that since you are spewing the liberal anti-conservative lines and attacking freerepubic as being anti-Reagan”
______________

Ignorant and untrue. I never condemned Free Republic, conservatism or anyone who posts here. If you have any character you will issue an apology.

Also, it is absolutely true that the 11th Commandment in and of itself is proof of my point. President Reagan (the first and second votes I cast for president) was far more forgiving of those who did not adhere to every point of conservatism than many in the conservative movement today.


94 posted on 02/25/2015 3:09:17 PM PST by Regal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: entropy12; stephenjohnbanker; EternalVigilance; GeronL; TheOldLady; trisham; xzins; P-Marlowe; ...
I see that you're getting your anti-Reagan talking points from Lew Rockwell.

That tells me everything I need to know about you. . . TROLL!

95 posted on 02/25/2015 3:11:20 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Regal; ansel12; stephenjohnbanker; EternalVigilance; GeronL; TheOldLady; trisham; xzins; ...
Also, it is absolutely true that the 11th Commandment in and of itself is proof of my point. President Reagan (the first and second votes I cast for president) was far more forgiving of those who did not adhere to every point of conservatism than many in the conservative movement today.

Typical retreat trying to smear President Reagan.

And what is this "11th Commandment" that you refer to? It's a damn myth made-up by RINOs trying to marginalize conservatives.

Ronald Reagan is the ONLY Republican in modern times to challenge a SITTING REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT for the GOP nomination and he did it by smearing Ford's liberal policies.

96 posted on 02/25/2015 3:16:17 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Reagan lived by the 11th Amendment and conservatism flourished.


97 posted on 02/25/2015 3:21:06 PM PST by Regal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Regal; ansel12; stephenjohnbanker; EternalVigilance; GeronL; TheOldLady; trisham; xzins; ...
Reagan lived by the 11th Amendment and conservatism flourished.

Really? Am I just imagining that he campaigned for the GOP nomination in 1976?

Reagan NEVER backed down on his conservative principles. He didn't attack other Republicans on their personal lives, but he attacked their policies all the time.

98 posted on 02/25/2015 3:31:26 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; entropy12

” I see that you’re getting your anti-Reagan talking points from Lew Rockwell.

That tells me everything I need to know about you. . . TROLL! “

LOL.. Buh bye, entropy12;)


99 posted on 02/25/2015 3:40:15 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Regal; ansel12; stephenjohnbanker; EternalVigilance; GeronL; TheOldLady; trisham; ...

” Reagan NEVER backed down on his conservative principles. He didn’t attack other Republicans on their personal lives, but he attacked their policies all the time. “

Yes, and that included big government Republicans like Dole, who told Reagan that he couldn’t get his tax cuts through the Senate. Dole found out otherwise.


100 posted on 02/25/2015 3:43:41 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson