As far as I am concerned, Obama has already gotten away with this, and more.
We need to face it. We are destined to be the new "North American Union" of the New World Order.
Posted on 02/24/2015 3:33:59 PM PST by Perdogg
This posted 11/22/14....Hat Tip to xzins
Immigration Reform Control Act of 1986 "NOTICE TO CONGRESS BEFORE IMPLEMENTING CHANGES" (Required)
Government Printing Office ^ | 1986 | US Congress Posted on 11/22/2014, 4:03:19 PM by xzins
Immigration Reform Control Act of 1986 "NOTICE TO CONGRESS BEFORE IMPLEMENTING CHANGES" (Required) Government Printing Office ^ | 1986 | US Congress
Posted on 11/22/2014, 4:03:19 PM by xzins
"(3) NOTICE TO CONGRESS BEFORE IMPLEMENTING CHANGES.—
"(A) IN GENERAL.—The President may not implement any change under paragraph (1) unless at least—
"(i) 60 days,
"(ii) one year, in the case of a major change described in subparagraph (D)(iii), or
"(iii) two years, in the case of a major change described in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (D), before the date of implementation of the change, the President has prepared and transmitted to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate a written report setting forth the proposed change.
If the President proposes to make any change regarding social security account number cards, the President shall transmit to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Finance of the Senate a written report setting forth the proposed change.
The President promptly shall cause to have printed in the Federal Register the substance of any major change (described in subparagraph (D)) proposed and reported to Congress.
"(B) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—In any report under subparagraph (A) the President shall include recommendations for the establishment of civil and criminal sanctions for unauthorized use or disclosure of the information or identifiers contained in such system.
"(C) CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW OF MAJOR CHANGES.—
"(i) HEARINGS AND REVIEW.—The Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate shall cause to have printed in the Congressional Record the substance of any major change described in subparagraph (D), shall hold hearings respecting the feasibility and desirability of implementing such a change, and, within the two year period before implementation, shall report to their respective Houses findings on whether or not such a change should be implemented.
"(ii) CONGRESSIONAL ACTION.—No major change may be implemented unless the Congress specifically provides, in an appropriations or other Act, for funds for implementation of the change.
"(D) MAJOR CHANGES REQUIRING TWO YEARS NOTICE AND CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW.—As used in this paragraph, the term 'major change' means a change which would—
"(i) require an individual to present a new card or other document (designed specifically for use for this purpose) at the time of hiring, recruitment, or referral,
"(ii) provide for a telephone verification system under which an employer, recruiter, or referrer must transmit to a Federal official information concerning the immigration status of prospective employees and the official transmits to the person, and the person must record, a verification code, or
"(iii) require any change in any card used for accounting purposes under the Social Security Act, 42 USC 301 note. including any change requiring that the only social security account number cards which may be presented in order to comply with subsection (bXlXCXi) are such cards as are in a counterfeit-resistant form consistent with the second sentence of section 205(cX2XD) of the Social Security Act. 42 use 405.
Discussion here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3230042/posts?page=83
First, Boehner and McConnell cave to Dirty Harry over DHS funding, the FCC is about to implement regulations that will do nothing but give the federal government control over the Internet and the ability to ban whoever doesn't agree with it, and now Amnesty may indeed be the law of the land because Congress won't stand up against lawlessness.
Did I leave anything out?
They can be reversed by courts also. Happened a few times in History. Roosevelt and Truman, and I believe Clinton.
Yes it is the Doctrine of ratification. If they fund an illegal act by the dictator— they Ratify it. I have been calling for two hours to my congressman and 2 senators to tell them they are making a huge legal error. I cant get in so i did email. The phones are jammed. Boehner MUST BE STOPPED. THEY ARE RATIFYING THIS EDICT!! the argument will be made —” judge ,they funded it !! they accept it. See the congress did its approval under the constitution. “!!! This is madness!! Total ratification!!
And the DAPA memorandum issued by DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson was never filed in the Federal Register, which means it has not been available for public comment as required by federal law for federal administrative agencies seeking to engage in rulemaking.
According to Judge Hanen, “The DAPA memorandum issued by Secretary Johnson is the focus in this suit.”
WND EXCLUSIVE
Head fake? Obama never signed amnesty order
National Archives official confirms shocker – no such filing exists
Published: 12/04/2014
http://www.wnd.com/2014/12/head-fake-obama-never-signed-amnesty-order/
__________________________________________
WND EXCLUSIVE
'Amnesty' ruling confirms Obama never signed executive order
Federal judge blocks 'unconstitutional' immigration memo by DHS chief Published: 02/17/2015 at 1:47 PM
http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/amnesty-ruling-confirms-obama-never-signed-executive-order/
___________________________________
Congress is doing just that!!
So, when the 5th Circuit goes and screws us all it will be OK because it's a conservative feeding it up the dirtchute of the citizens of the several states?
It's high time to stop paying federal taxes.
We need to melt the phonelines!! Facebook, Twitter etc..let them know we’re on to their scheme!
“them” who?
And I fully expect the administration mouthpieces to make noise about any funding in their arguments. The administration will state, accurately, that the Congress had an opportunity to NOT fund this initiative. In the end, after arguing and fighting, the representatives of the People and the representatives of the States both permitted the funding. There IS agreement then of funding this initiative.
As far as I am concerned, Obama has already gotten away with this, and more.
We need to face it. We are destined to be the new "North American Union" of the New World Order.
“It’s high time to stop paying federal taxes.”
Do it!
This will be our first year not supporting this fascist regime. See tagline. If you keep your MAGI low enough, you won’t pay much in taxes.
You are correct.
Usurpation Day January 20, 2009
The Day The Constitution Died
GOPlite - just as bad as the RATs
Praise Jesus. Thank you.
Good analyses. I am emailing all true conservatives in the House and Senate that RATIFICATION is a real threat.
EO require/are to be clearly sourced laws that enumerates what the Prez wants to do within the confines of the Executive Branch. Hence the reason why BO has not issued a EO but impotent memos that can be ignored without the proper legislation in conjunction with the attempt at tyrannical rule.
If McConnell puts the separate bill out there for a vote and passes the “clean” bill, conservatives in the House will not be able to stop the “clean” bill from passing with all the democrats plus the GOPe. I think the only other chance would be another filibuster from Cruz or Sessions to keep the “clean” bill off the Senate calendar. The trouble is that republicans will cave. They are most reliably unreliable.
For God’s sake they are Ratifying an illegal act by funding it. Please contact your congressmen and Senators that THEY ARE RATIFYING THE ILLEGAL EDICT!! It is congressional approval. Get this argument out there. It is legally devastating.DOJ will argue that “THEY FUNDED IT” how then could they be against it. If anyone is on twitter with Laura Ingram or Hannity or Rush — let it fly. It is YHE DOCTRINE OF RATIFICATION !! Please . This is madness.
Excellent post!
Just makes me more angry about the lawless creatin in the WH though ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.