[fivecatsandadog]

So when are they going to start rounding everyone up? Basically, anyone with conservative leanings is a domestic "terrorist".

I don't have time to examine the link at each of the 72 items, but the few that I did look at - the issue date for the document was after Obama's election. Wondering if any of these criteria were in effect before his election (previous administrations), or if all of this was developed/implemented since his administration has been in power.

[TigersEye]

THE DEFINITION OF “DOMESTIC TERRORISM” November 20, 2001

See especially post #16. published 1999

[GOPJ]

Wondering if any of these criteria were in effect before his election (previous administrations), or if all of this was developed/implemented since his administration has been in power.

This started under Bill Clinton. I've made comments about it off and on for decades - it's the reason I joined FreeRepublic. I've known about the 'vast right wing conspiracy' since before Hillary spilled the beans about it...(thank God she did - citizens were able to make jokes about it - defusing a serious totalitarian move) At that time the Southern Poverty Law Center was working with (rouges?) in the FBI putting out lies about middle aged, middle class white men killing police officers - to move up in 'the priesthood' of the right wing.

I heard the story while with a person who wrote for the local paper... we both agreed that if large numbers of police officers were being killed by 'the right wing' newspapers would have picked up on it. As my friend pointed out there aren't many murders of police officers that are 'under the radar'...

As a reality check: National statistics show the 6% of citizens who are both black AND male are the most likely to kill a police officer. Middle class white men are among the least... Since democrats can hardly work together to order a pizza - it makes one wonder if this isn't supported by some communist group... with a long... long timeline.

[Smokin' Joe]

The SPLC has been in bed with the Feds all along telling who is a "terrorist" while pushing their own liberal agenda. I am sure some of the categories have been around for well before Obama, but the conspicuous absence of the very bunch who have crashed planes, sometimes into buildings, blown up embassies, Marine Barracks, shot people, even troops in a chow line, and are at the bottom of almost every credible bombing plot indicates to me that certain groups are considered to be just fine doing all that stuff, while the groups they list conspicuously haven't done those things.

There would have to be some influences there keeping the heat off the jihadi set, and that might just be because DHS and our government are lousy with MB affiliates in high places.