Serious question; the way this was argued to me was that should the florist
prevail, would that in some way be considered discrimination and if so would it then allow other businesses to discriminate against against other couples they might not `believe` in, such as inter-racial couples? I admit I was unprepared to argue the point.
People have been artificially conditioned to accept more and more limitations on their rights to make their own free choices in their own affairs. It is by this step by step imposition of limitations, that freedom is lost.
There is a major difference between doing something mischievous, intended to harm another; and simply preferring to do business with one person, rather than another.