Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

After 50 years I have come to the belief that we were never meant to win in Viet Nam.

Viet Nam, like Korea before it, were a way to fight the Soviet Union without going nuclear. It was a way to bleed the Soviets (they and the Chinese were providing the material to fight the war).

By the end of 1966 we had the man power and the air superiority to overwhelm the Viet Cong and the North Viet Names Army. We pissed away our advantage.

Over the past few days I have been reading newspaper articles that covered Nov 1965 to Nov 1966 (the time I was there).

I realized every operation we made was in the newspaper within a day of the operation beginning, along with the goals, and the means. The enemy did not need any spies to figure out what we were doing, the media was telling them, sometimes with maps!

Not only that, they were telling them how effective or not effective we were.

The enemy knew where we were, what we were doing, and more important where we were not. No one can win a war if the enemy knows that much information about you.


25 posted on 02/23/2015 6:16:38 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN (I do not doubt that our climate changes. I only doubt that anything man does has any effect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CIB-173RDABN
"After 50 years I have come to the belief that we were never meant to win in Viet Nam."

Of course the politicos had a major hand in selling us out with defining very narrow objectives and then reneging on continuing to arm our South Vietnamese allies after the Paris Peace accords in 1973. However, the Generals failed in their part also. I believe a lot of their thinking came through in Matt Ridgeway's book about his experiences taking over for Douglass McArthur during the Korean War. In it, he advocated for this idea of limited warfare in the age of the Cold War. Don't get me wrong, Matt Ridgeway was a true American hero and commander of the 82nd Airborne on D-Day, but I believe he was dead wrong.

Another good book to read on the subject of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and how Johnson played them in the runup to the buildup of the Vietnam war is "Dereliction of Duty". Suffice it to say that General Wallace Greene and General Curtis LeMay advised to go all out to win or don't go to war at all. However, the Cuban Missile Crisis had made Generals reticent about all out war and Johnson knew how to manuever them.
52 posted on 02/23/2015 6:52:14 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: CIB-173RDABN
Not only that, they were telling them how effective or not effective we were.

As long as you let the enemy have a King's X line you can never win anything. 38th Parallel comes to mind.

83 posted on 02/23/2015 11:44:55 AM PST by itsahoot (55 years a republican-Now Independent. Will write in Sarah Palin, no matter who runs. $.98-$.89<$.10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson