Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The title of this article in my local paper was, "Initial jobless claims fall back below healthy level" which implied to me that someone thought that 300K is a threshold we should not dip below. The first sentence of the article actually makes it unclear which direction the article is implying is good or bad for the economy.

Personally, I would say going as low as possible can only be good. But the first time jobless claims only tell one aspect of the information on the economy. I think it makes great headlines, but the number of total people unemployed and related to this the number receiving unemployment.

1 posted on 02/20/2015 2:01:18 PM PST by Steven Scharf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Steven Scharf
But the four-week average, which smooths out some of the volatility, indicates that initial claims are still consistent with the solid job growth the economy has posted in recent months.

Then the total number of unemployed/underemployed must be dropping, right?

Right?

2 posted on 02/20/2015 2:03:20 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steven Scharf

4 posted on 02/20/2015 2:06:53 PM PST by JPG (The GOPe will always find a way to surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steven Scharf

...Initial jobless claims below 300,000...”
-
Happy days are here again,
The skies above are clear again,
So lets sing a song of cheer again,
Happy days are here again.


5 posted on 02/20/2015 2:09:16 PM PST by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy, and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steven Scharf

Nothing but great news for 7 years now...economy must be roaring.


6 posted on 02/20/2015 2:11:52 PM PST by lacrew (5th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steven Scharf

We need “ cookthebooks.com “


7 posted on 02/20/2015 2:13:19 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steven Scharf

300,000 Initial Jobless claims. If by “initial” you mean the first week you file, and you are no longer counted, then the numbers break out as follows:

300,000 X 52 = 15,600,000 people becoming unemployed every year.

THAT is a healthy economy?


9 posted on 02/20/2015 2:27:03 PM PST by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steven Scharf
Is there any logic to any of these numbers? They just say whatever without actually worrying about the economy, how government policy may or may not be affecting businesses, or how people are getting by out in the real world.

I swear they just spin a big wheel and they reveal some number that serves as economic data for the next week or month or whatever.

10 posted on 02/20/2015 2:33:31 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (The dog days are over /The dog days are done/Can you hear the horses? /'Cause here they come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steven Scharf
It's all roses and candy then...?
11 posted on 02/20/2015 2:48:00 PM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steven Scharf
Initial jobless claims drop back below 300,000

Bullsh!t, lies, and books-cooking...as usual.

13 posted on 02/20/2015 3:12:39 PM PST by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steven Scharf

If you lose your part-time job, can you file for unemployment?


14 posted on 02/20/2015 5:22:09 PM PST by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson