Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservingFreedom
States can't violate restrictions placed on them by the Constitution, which includes "no slavery" but not "no pot."

But with pot, the slavery isn't put on the users so much as on those of us who have to pay for them to sit around all day drawing welfare instead of working.

I am firmly against slavery, and so we shouldn't let any drug addicts make us into slaves.

98 posted on 02/20/2015 2:37:21 PM PST by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
But with pot, the slavery isn't put on the users so much as on those of us who have to pay for them to sit around all day drawing welfare instead of working.

I am firmly against slavery, and so we shouldn't let any drug addicts make us into slaves.

Pot bans also affect non-welfare recipients; your goal can be accomplished with no collateral damage by conditioning welfare on the passing of drug tests - or, for that matter, an end to welfare.

102 posted on 02/20/2015 2:45:45 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson