Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman; DiogenesLamp
nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law

The key phrase being "without due process of law."

Disenfranchising convicted felons no more violates the 14th Amendment then imprisoning them does. I would say that the right not to be locked up in a room for years is a far more fundamental right than the right to vote.

64 posted on 02/20/2015 1:55:56 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba_Leroy

Exactly.


81 posted on 02/20/2015 2:16:17 PM PST by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Disenfranchising convicted felons no more violates the 14th Amendment then imprisoning them does.

Actually it does — because the law is not valid.
That's right, it is a legal non-entity.

Why?
The Constitution speciffically prohibits laws of an Ex Post Facto nature to both the federal government and the states; even with the Supreme Courts considering this restriction only upon criminal laws, that this increased the punishments of those already tried and convected makes it ex post facto.

124 posted on 02/21/2015 3:36:56 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson