Pray, tell me where I “defended the burning at the stake precedent.”
All I did was simply point out that the RCC was not the only body that burned people. Hell, the Romans used to cover prisoners with pitch and light them up to provide illumination for the night time fun and games. American Indians routinely burned captives (you should read about the Manheim twins someday; and Colonel Crawford, just to name a couple).
You are so filled with hate for Catholicism (calling Catholics “Papists” is a dead giveaway) that you can’t even see straight.
Let’s see, a Papist makes a hit on Protestants on a thread that is supposed to be about Obama and the Dems, someone calls them on it, and he is “full of hate.” I get it.
Standard fare for Papists, anyone who refuses to bow the knee to the Pope, be subservient to him, including this latest Marxist one, is a “hater.”
Anyone that utters the word, “Papist,” is also a hater, never mind that the Papacy has always been at the center of the dispute between Roman Catholicism and the Reformers: Protestants holding to Christ alone as the head of the church, Papists having the Pope of Rome the head of it.
“Papist” is not derogatory, it’s what you are... until such day that you denounce your Pope as head over the rest of us Christians, that is. If such should happen, then, and only then, will I no longer think of you a papist.
You are determined to hijack this thread in the name of the papacy, I see.