Skip to comments.
Study Shows Heavy Adolescent Pot Use Permanently Lowers IQ
Forbes ^
| 2/10/2015
| Travis Bradberry
Posted on 02/11/2015 3:15:57 PM PST by Mount Athos
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-103 next last
To: Mount Athos
I’ll throw this out there...
Maybe people are more inclined to smoke pot if they have a lower IQ (?), smart people stay away. Would you not get the same statistics - people who used pot a lot since youth have a lower IQ?
61
posted on
02/11/2015 4:50:52 PM PST
by
fuzzylogic
(welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
To: eastforker
Once a week...once every 3 days..?
What about 4 times two nights a week?
I work 7 days a week,.....I guess I'm "null and void".
62
posted on
02/11/2015 4:52:29 PM PST
by
Osage Orange
(I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
To: dforest
LOL. I was wondering if anybody would catch that. I dont feel as bad about my younger days filled with partying when I say it that way.
63
posted on
02/11/2015 4:55:18 PM PST
by
barmag25
(Cruz 2016)
To: JaguarXKE
64
posted on
02/11/2015 4:57:52 PM PST
by
Big Red Badger
( Tag line Deconstruction,)
To: Osage Orange
No, I am talking about the 24/7 porno perverts like the ones we read about raping and such. Schoolteachers and that sort of thing.
65
posted on
02/11/2015 4:58:23 PM PST
by
eastforker
(Cruz for steam in 2016)
To: Mount Athos
At the very beginning of
the study (paragraph 3) is this...
The extant evidence base draws on casecontrol studies of recruited cannabis users and comparison subjects.
So the "Participants were members of the Dunedin Study, a prospective study of a birth cohort of 1,037 individuals followed from birth (1972/1973) to age 38 y."...were the comparison subjects, not the actual cannabis users.
The rest of "the study" should be just as entertaining.
Oh, BTW...Edited by Michael I. Posner, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, and approved July 30, 2012 (received for review April 23, 2012)
Why did it take 3 years for Forbes to write this article?
Accumulating evidence suggests that long-term, heavy cannabis use may cause enduring neuropsychological impairment...
Oh yeah, keep those stereotypical comments coming WODdies.
66
posted on
02/11/2015 4:58:55 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Mount Athos
....and makes them better Democrats.
67
posted on
02/11/2015 4:59:20 PM PST
by
OrangeHoof
(Every time you say no to a liberal, you make the Baby Barack cry.)
To: Mount Athos
Oh my...
Results showed that associations between persistent cannabis dependence and all four WAIS-IV indexes could be equated without a resultant deterioration in model fit (Δχ2 = 2.13, df = 3, P = 0.55), which suggests that impairment was not statistically significantly different across neuropsychological domains.Those damn models!
68
posted on
02/11/2015 5:06:47 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: ansel12
Nope. But it will reduce opportunities for it.
69
posted on
02/11/2015 5:10:29 PM PST
by
Little Ray
(How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
To: Mount Athos
Oh my...
The studys results must be interpreted in the context of its limitations. First, although we were able to rule out a set of plausible alternative explanations for the association between persistent cannabis use and neuropsychological functioning, such as premorbid neuropsychological deficit and hard-drug and alcohol dependence among persistent cannabis users, our data cannot definitively attest to whether this association is causal.So why the hoopla?
70
posted on
02/11/2015 5:10:44 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: EnigmaticAnomaly
Not your problem. Protect your kids.
71
posted on
02/11/2015 5:11:04 PM PST
by
Little Ray
(How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
To: Mount Athos
72
posted on
02/11/2015 5:12:48 PM PST
by
A Cyrenian
(Don't worry about stuffing the bus or filling the fridge. Try filling the Church.)
To: vpintheak
Only one, my wife.
And she’s just fine.
Except for marrying me, of course.
She does mention that there are parts of her life she only vaguely remembers. That might be related to pot use.
But if pot use reduces IQ, I’d hate to see what she would have been like without it. She operates around genius level now.
73
posted on
02/11/2015 5:13:35 PM PST
by
Little Ray
(How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
To: Mount Athos
This explains the ‘quality’ of the arguments in favor of pot legalization.
74
posted on
02/11/2015 5:15:22 PM PST
by
gogeo
(If you are Tea Party, the eGOP does not want you.)
To: eastforker
Well...you said...
Sex Act.
Then you said..doing anything to excess....you become null and void..And that's where I said I work 7 days a week...and must be null and void. : )
75
posted on
02/11/2015 5:19:42 PM PST
by
Osage Orange
(I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
To: Mount Athos
Um, it is called “dope” for a reason...
76
posted on
02/11/2015 5:35:30 PM PST
by
piytar
(If you don't know what taqiyya and the doctrine of abrogation are, you are a fool!)
To: barmag25
It is almost like having a couple few beers.
77
posted on
02/11/2015 5:39:24 PM PST
by
dforest
To: Little Ray
So it wouldn’t change anything, you just want drugs legalized.
78
posted on
02/11/2015 5:48:29 PM PST
by
ansel12
(Civilization, Crusade against the Mohammedan Death Cult.)
To: Little Ray
"Studies show that drug laws lead to wrong doors being kicked in, pets and innocent people being shot, property being stolen under color of law, and prison beds being filled with non-violent offenders."
It doesn't have to be that way. There are such things as priorities and common sense. Back when homosexual behavior was illegal in most places, actual arrests of homosexuals for such behavior were rare, and usually confined to situations when that behavior took place in public. The police typically weren't going door-to-door seeking out homosexuals.
Enforcement of anti-marijuana laws could be something like that, posing just enough threat to discourage widespread or flagrant use without threatening civil liberties, due process, or wasting billions of dollars.
To: barmag25
When I run in to them from time to time they look 10 years older than the rest of us and just not the kind of people you can have a conversation with. I have had the same experience. I use pot a lot in high school. In my early twenties I gave it up, at my girlfriend's insistence (I really wanted to keep her and we soon married). Around ten years after leaving high school I noticed my friends who still smoked pot were going no where in careers and life, and didn't care. I had moved on to six-figure salaries and they were still doing simple delivery or other minimum wage jobs. Plus they looked haggard and old. They lost the incentive to better themselves.
80
posted on
02/11/2015 6:07:48 PM PST
by
roadcat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson