Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vigilanteman
I wouldn't call him an anti-semite.

Then you're delusional.

But he has a blind spot when the topic has anything to do with Jooze.

But isn't that the dictionary definition of an "anti-Semite?" Why then wouldn't you call him one?

59 posted on 02/06/2015 2:12:10 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Throne and Altar! [In Jerusalem!!!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Zionist Conspirator

I knew he was bad news in 2000, and I was an 18 year old first time voter then.


64 posted on 02/06/2015 2:35:52 PM PST by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: Zionist Conspirator
Because I've seen no evidence that Pat Buchanan denies the holocaust, admires Hitler or anything of that sort and I'm willing to give people the benefit of the doubt until proved otherwise.

Even Gandhi had a total blind spot for these sort of things and was naive enough to think that World War II was preventable.

Gandhi could have been an anti-semite as could Buchanan. Neither, however, did anywhere close to the damage of an Obama or even a Jimmy Carter in said regard.

65 posted on 02/06/2015 2:49:01 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson