Objectively, you've conflated "choosing not to vaccinate" with child abuse, which is aught more than statist propaganda.
Anyone who disagrees with your smug dogma is, apparently, an "idiot" or a "moron".
Let me be clear: I'm completely convinced that vaccinations are a net benefit to society.
But I'm equally convinced that people should be FREE to make such decisions for themselves and their children, and not forced to do so by the state.
Making a choice other than the one you so vehemently advocate does not make anybody a moron, idiot, or anarchist.
I'm sure you're a well-meaning individual whose heart is in the right place. It's just too bad that your sentiments are accompanied by such shameful and inexcusable abuse.
Try some civility next time.
I want you to point out to me how the claim that you have a "right" to be infected by a disease which you might spread to other people is any different from the selfish claim [implicitly] made by a symptomatic doctor returning to the US after treating Ebola patients in West Africa that he had a "right" to go bowling in one of the most densely populated places on Earth.
I want you to tell me where you think this supposed "liberty" ends? Do you have the right to genitally mutilate your daughter because your religion says so, and the state may not be allowed to interfere in that?
Given what we know, choosing not to vaccinate is child abuse. There's no "conflation."