And every single climate, weather and geology paper published in the past 20 years has the same statement about anthropogenic global warming.
The fact that he LIED in the paper that supposedly closed the door on the association is the most important part.
Clearly he has religious belief in the matter and his belief system allowed him to ‘adjust’ science to match his beliefs.
Much like the global warming true believers do in their ‘research papers’.
Ah, so your bias caused you to intentionally quote only the portion of the statement you believed in. Which is the ‘lie’ in the 2004 report. The data was excluded as it appeared to be corrupted by a small sample and an over sample of those vaccinated in order to attend early start preschool who had autism.
But then if you subscribe to the entire coverup theory, then if you aren’t talking about an black male child, then the MMR is clearly demonstrated as to be unrelated to autism. Or are you going to cherry pick that too?
Be consistent. If you’re going to say that study with the omitted data included indicates that there is a more that 300 percent increase in autism amoung black male children, then you also have to include the zero percent increase in all other demographics.