I beg to differ. The balance of my comment contains the very heart of my reasoning for choosing Ted Cruz over Scott Walker. It's because of that reasoning, that you redacted that portion of what I said. It's airtight, and cannot be denied.
As I said before, I don't dislike Scott Walker, and do commend him for the positive things he's done for his state. He's just not made of the sort of stuff that is required of the man who will succeed Obama The Destroyer of Worlds in the White House in 2016.
For that, we need a person with the visionary type of mind and the kind of backbone that was possessed by the Framers. There is only one person in the running who meets that description, and that is Ted Cruz.
If you want, I’ll consider all of your words.
It doesn’t change the fact that my entire posts have been directed at your lack of faith in Cruz’s abilities.