not arguing with you but it says in the article “suspect’s attorney” over and over so im not sure what that means if you’re saying otherwise. do you have differing info?
The article posted says in it twice that “her” client was being questioned. That’s what Im going by.
She said in the video, “he is not being represent by us”. She works for the public defender and I assume, that is the “us” she refers to...if he is not indeed her client then she had no standing to interfere.