Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

My guess is that SCOTUS will rule that excluding people who buy from the federal exchange from getting subsidies violates the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment.


11 posted on 01/28/2015 2:20:15 PM PST by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!",)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hugin

TRANSLATION: Screw the language of the law.


12 posted on 01/28/2015 2:24:58 PM PST by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Hugin

“My guess is that SCOTUS will rule that excluding people who buy from the federal exchange from getting subsidies violates the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment.”
******************************************************************************************************
You do realize that there exist NUMEROUS federal statutes that provide subsidies and benefits to a state’s residents IF the state takes certain action - and precludes those benefits if the state does NOT take the specified action. These statutes and rules have existed for decades without equal protection being effectively raised as an issue.

The incentives in the Affordable Care Act to “incentivize” the states to set up their own exchanges are just one more of this type of statute.


16 posted on 01/28/2015 2:29:53 PM PST by House Atreides (CRUZ or lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson