Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
No, it's a number cited by the people charged with combating drug addiction. And it puts lie to your claim.

No it doesn't, despite your assertions to the contrary.

Yes it does.

Your two data point extrapolation with one number made up is childish.

Those 2 numbers come from your heroic Drug Warriors.

That you expect it to be accepted and "prove" something is even more childish.

It demonstrates that the numbers from the people running the WOD say you are FOS.

200 posted on 01/28/2015 4:37:57 PM PST by Ken H (What happens on the internet, stays on the internet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]


To: Ken H; DiogenesLamp
FYI, in another drug thread DiogenesLamp said, "Reliable or not, those are the figures being put out by the people who make it their job to come up with such figures. No doubt they are a statistical extrapolation. Till someone presents an argument that there are better figures, I will have no choice but to use what is available."
219 posted on 01/29/2015 8:35:41 AM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson