Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HomerBohn
Let's just take that first number against H3N2. Sixty-five percent? That's the general rate of vaccine effectiveness? Well WOO HOO. What about the other 45%??? Sixty-five percent isn't even that high anyway considering these people are taking a shot filled with chemicals and heavy metals that bypasses their natural immune systems and all the risks that go along with that. But that 65% protection is for unvaccinated people. Check out the protection for the good little citizens who take their government-recommended flu cocktail every year: 24%. ONLY TWENTY-FOUR PERCENT. Even against flu strain B, those same vaccinated people only get 48% protection.

65%, 48% and 25% protection are a lot better than 0% protection. If people don't want to get the flu shot, then fine, that's a personal choice; but to suggest that the flue shot is worthless and of no value or benefit is an act of journalistic malpractice.

69 posted on 01/27/2015 7:32:40 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Labyrinthos

http://sharylattkisson.com/govt-researchers-flu-shots-not-effective-in-elderly-after-all/

Do read that writeup.

Lots of official statistical shenanigans with this shot. Lots.


73 posted on 01/27/2015 7:59:39 AM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson