Actually the mods should look at your posting history and try to figure out why this simple and accurate post on Mitt Romney. Which disagreed with your claim of “”I think that there is a lot of evidence that he is a good person,””
Got such a long and nasty attack from you in response, post 32, and then these continued nasty little follow ups.
To: fireman15
Actually, the evidence is that Romney is a foul and despicable person when you look at his almost 70 years of life.
A man of low character and low morals, and a pathological liar.
14 posted on 1/26/2015, 12:41:34 PM by ansel12
You seem willing to attack, and insult, but not defend your disagreeing with post 14.
“Mitt Romney, you’re an honorable and accomplished man. You would have been a good president and infinitely better than Obama as a steward of the economy and national security. But, Mitt, we need to talk. You don’t get it.”
Those are not my words... they are the first three sentences of the article that we have been discussing. Which is roughly what I mimicked in my initial post only not as strongly. You have been trying to force me into defending Mr. Romney from your first post which I have not done because I AM NOT A ROMNEY SUPPORTER.
Your only goal here appears to be to torment me by mischaracterizing virtually everything that I have said and making false accusations... and we are on the same side! I am starting to think that there really is something wrong with you! This is some sort of surreal discussion! As a person who assessed persons with mental and physical emergencies for nearly 25 years... I TRULY am concerned this evening about your mental and physical well being. I am comforted only by your history of similar posts to others.