In general, I appreciate Lloyd’s opinions, but the headline of this piece does nothing more that parrot some very clever libtard’s choice of words. I’m weary of conservatives who at the first hint of Palin’s name ‘expertly’ claim “she’s toxic”. Kudos the the original libtard who first put the two words “toxic” and “Palin” in the same sentence. It has worked so well that we now even have guy’s who have risen up in name recognition by championing conservative TEA party principles using the “toxic Palin” meme.
Palin is a TONIC.
Toxic or tonic? Look up "tonic" and there's Palin's pic next to the definition.
Look up "toxic" and see Hillary's pic.
Yes, except the whole point of Lloyd’s column is to mock how the liberal tainted/smeared Palin with the “toxic” label, which he roundly rejects, if you read the whole column.