We have cowered and played defense so long that we scarcely understand reality anymore. The Supreme Court recognizing homosexual marriage isn’t parallel to Roe v. Wade. Lawrence v. Texas legalizing homosexuality is what is parallel to Roe v. Wade. That is what we should have been protesting all along. It would at least make those espousing the homosexual agenda play defense a little more. If we continue as we are currently doing, we are just waiting for them to chip away little by little at what remains of the moral fabric of society. It is long past time to play offense. We couldn’t do any worse than what we are currently doing.
This is what I’ve been saying all along, and here’s where nullification and state’s rights would really make a difference. Forget nullification of “gay marriage.” That’s closing the barn door after the horse is gone. Conservative states should nullify Lawrence.
They say you can beat the rap, but you can’t beat the ride. Even if higher courts ultimately overturn the convictions, truly conservative states should be passing their own laws and enforcing them to keep this filth where it belongs - underground or in prison.
Think fags would live in a state where they could be arrested for so-called “consensual sex?” Where they would be arrested, jailed and imprisoned until such time as the appeal was heard, and Federal marshals came to let them out?
Sure, the convictions won’t stand up. So? States should enforce their own community standards, and if the Feds interfere, let it be clear that it’s the Feds who are permitting this filth in public, and the States will continue to enforce their own laws.
What’s the downside?