[CatherineofAragon]

"Palin's and Cruz's suporters are and have been mostly the same people. That you would make such a sexist inference from what I posted shows some sort of improper bias of your interpretation of what was posted. What gives?"

Sexist, schmexist.

Again, you said:

"You’ve never lost the (real and true) women’s support."

So please spare me the stuff about "interpretation."

[Resettozero]

So please spare me the stuff about "interpretation."

I posted in a memo to SP "You've never lost the (real and true) women's support" and you interpreted that as sexist somehow against the women who support Ted Cruz. The meaning is clear and made specifically clear by referring to real true women who have been Palin supporters in the past and not the grouchy sexist screwed-up lib feminists who are only malfunctional females and NEVER DID SUPPORT PALIN.

Is there truly that much of a problem with understanding my posted statements other than you just want to be contrary today?

(See what can happen when you mess around too long with Henry...?)