When translated, he was found to say,
“You ISIS people are going to get a REAL serious talking to!
Now, go to your room and wait until Obama gets home!
And, NO TV for a week!”
“One billion, three hundred thousand Muslims are ready to kill you…”
January 25, 2015 sheikyer mami
You’re not supposed to know, and you can’t be permitted to notice that Muhammad was “a merciless war chief, plunderer, slaughterer of Jews and a polygamist.”
The Redeker case
by Hugh Fitzgerald
What may be recognized, in a whisper, by some “within the family,” can never ever be said by those without. That is the motto of many, not only of Cosa Nostra. But most members of this fanatical faith — fanatical in posse, and in esse, far more than others now called “religions” — are unlikely to conclude, from the same facts that M. Redeker knew of, that Muhammad was “a merciless war chief, plunderer, slaughterer of Jews and a polygamist.” That he led 77 expeditions and was ruthless in his dealings with those who refused to yield to him, that he took booty and even established rules for the distribution of such booty, that he massacred Jewish tribes who refused to submit to him, or even Jews who had no dealings with him whatsoever, as the inoffensive farmers of the Khaybar Oasis, that he had 9 or 11 wives, depending on whom you count — all this is true, but to have a non-Muslim write or say that Muhammad was “a merciless war chief, plunderer, slaughterer of Jews and a polygamist” is simply — not allowed. It can be known, and it can be reveled in, by a billion Muslims. But not a single non-Muslim is permitted to notice this.
For the world is divided, in Islam, between Muslim and non-Muslim, Believer and Infidel. Infidels are not permitted to express any view of Islam that is critical. It would not be right, it would not be just. Come to think of it, Muslims are not permitted to express criticism of Muhammad either, but for Muslims, speaking to a Muslim audience, some will describe Muhammad with pride as “a merciless war chief, plunderer, slaughterer of Jews and a polygamist” in those or very similar terms, and others will express the same thing in a different, slightly more muted way. But in either case the description cannot be taken as criticism. For whatever Muhammad did was right. He is the Perfect Man, uswa hasana, al-insan al-kamil. Were he not the Perfect Man, Islam itself might crumble.
In Redeker’s case — he being an Infidel — his articulating the very aspects of Muhammad’s life that Muslims are taught not as deplorable but as part of his entirely admirable existence, have earned him the murderous threats he has received.
There is no contradiction here. This is your brain. This is your brain on Islam.
http://sheikyermami.com/one-billion-three-hundred-thousand-muslims-are-ready-to-kill-you/