[holden]

operated by a company called Soweva, wanted to "reduce the number of African-American employees...

IANAL, but from what I've seen of scores of hours of time in depositions and courtroom situations is that presumed testimony from third-parties claiming to represent what other people were thinking or "wanting" get objected to immediately and are those objections are as a matter of course sustained by the judge. Such testimony is not allowed.

I trust poor performance review information for those let go will come out in court.

HF

[SkyPilot]

IANAL, but from what I've seen of scores of hours of time in depositions and courtroom situations is that presumed testimony from third-parties claiming to represent what other people were thinking or "wanting" get objected to immediately and are those objections are as a matter of course sustained by the judge. Such testimony is not allowed.

Thanks for sharing that.

It also reminds me of the transcripts from when the FBI agents questioned the Ferguson "witnesses." Their stories fell apart within minutes, sometimes seconds.

The best response went like this:

FBI Agent: So, you are admitting you lied in your previous testimony?

Witness: Umm, yea. I had to change my story so it backed up them facts that a white cop murdered an unarmed teenager.