Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Balding_Eagle

There was no bill per se. It was a proposition voted on by the electorate and only the fact of the outcome of the election was signed by Hickenlooper and the setting up of a committee to facilitate the accessibility of the now legal Pot.

I am no fan of Hickenlooper...on the contrary I hate him for his push for and signing of the antigun law. But the people responsible for the Pot Law travesty are the voting population of Colorado... a 55% plurality


21 posted on 01/23/2015 7:34:29 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Vaquero

Oh, that’s right.

We voted against it.


41 posted on 01/23/2015 8:13:55 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (The Gruber Revelations are proof that God is still smiling on America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Vaquero

Too bad the left hasn’t been that respectful of all the states which passed propositions, some more than once, opposing the legalisation of sodomite “marriage”. Instead they ran to sympathetic judges to have them overturned in the courts.


43 posted on 01/23/2015 8:17:00 AM PST by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Vaquero; All

And in Washington, DC the Congressional “let’s reduce the size/influence of the Federal Government” folks are forbidding implementing the law 70% of DC residents voted for, legalizing small amounts of pot grown and smoked indoors. Such logical inconsistency will not result in continued conservative electoral success.


81 posted on 01/23/2015 10:19:53 AM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson