Here it comes.
Race quotas for neighborhoods.
Don’t try to get away from us, the government won’t let you.
“...the agency had failed to provide adequate opportunities for low-income housing in Dallas’ more affluent suburbs.”
Right! I can see them now putting the old Section 8 Race Neutral Hovels in one of the Dallas gated community areas. Think the rich liberal hypocrites will allow that to happen?
Prepare for the cities to burn.
Low income housing has nothing to do with race...there are FAR more poor whites than there are blacks....not even close.
"...The FHA prohibits anyone from refusing to sell, rent, or otherwise make unavailable a house or apartment to a person because of their race, religion, or national origin. There is no dispute about this aspect of the law [emphasis added]."
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
What law schools did justices get indoctrinated at? (I don’t really want to know.)
Noting that this doesn’t seem to be a religous expression issue, please consider the following. A previous generation of state power-respecting justices has already clarified, in broad terms, that the states have never granted the feds, expressly via Constitution, the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for vote-winning intrastate housing purposes. In fact, the Founding States had made the 10th Amendment to likewise clarify in broad terms that such issues are state power issues.
State power-respecting justices have also clarified that neither have the states granted the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate intrastate commerce.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added].” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
And before Constitution-ignoring socialist FDR “nuked” the Supreme Court with activist majority justices, state power-respecting justices had also clarified that powers which the states have not expressly delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the powers to regulate intrastate housing and intrastate commerce in this example, are prohibited to the feds.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
So will somebody please explain to me exactly what the Supremes are trying to decide concerning this Texas housing issue?
The entire legal theory of “disparate impact” is incredibly evil and destructive.
If I were running any type of business/rentals I would not even have a block to check for race.
I never fill in race on the census form. And when they call asking me about it I simply tell them that we are of the human race. The keep pressing until I finally hang up.