[JimRed]

Some of those, like New Jersey, are probably non-starters.

Then why are a whole passel of RAT NJ assemblymen co-sponsoring a bill join the move to do it? (NJ ACR-149)

I smell a RAT!

[Publius]

The language of New Jersey's application is dedicated to overturning Citizens United. The New Jersey Legislature also has a resolution applying for an Amendments Convention dedicated to Mark Levin's proposed amendments, which are contained in Georgia's application language. That vote is a non-starter.

Remember that the Office of the Archivist of the United States tabulates applications in a spreadsheet by state (row) and subject (column). New Jersey, should it vote for an Amendments Convention on overturning Citizens United, would not have its application tabulated with those states, like Georgia, that have applied for a convention to discuss Mark Levin's amendments.

It's a case of apples and oranges.