Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz sounded a whole lot like Elizabeth Warren on Fox News last night
Vox ^ | January 21, 2015 | Andrew Prokop

Posted on 01/21/2015 5:23:42 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Eat the rich.


21 posted on 01/21/2015 5:49:46 PM PST by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Bring back American jobs, and make stuff right here.

Maybe if we raise taxes enough, that will magically happen?

22 posted on 01/21/2015 5:50:50 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JFoobar

2ndDV posts Cruz articles, this is what the enemy is saying, and we need to know it. If it slipped you, some of us here are trying to get Cruz elected.


23 posted on 01/21/2015 5:53:07 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Some of that 1% earned it with hard work and honesty. But a large number of them earned it in ways that once upon a time would have been illegal and landed them in jail. In fact; many times how they earned it was illegal, but when you are in a “protected” profession such as working for investment banks then you can pilfer money anyway you want.


24 posted on 01/21/2015 5:54:30 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

You can bet that the top 1% subsidize the bottom 70% in one form or another.


25 posted on 01/21/2015 5:55:15 PM PST by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I believe there is a better way to address this, and it doesn’t include class warfare.

Simply address the fact that we 92 million able bodied people out of work. That’s all. You don’t talk about “rich people” and you don’t talk about “poor people”.

You talk about job growth since 2000 and the fact is has been almost negligible. You look at growth up to 2000, and it’s about 9.75% per every four years. Since 2000, it has been about 1% every four years, if we were lucky.

In 2016, it will have been four terms in office, and only job growth of about 5%. In four terms job growth normally reaches around 40% plus.

Each four years 9.75%. The first four is 9.75% on the orginal figure. The second is 9.75% on the first figure plus the first 9.75%, and so on for four terms.

Bush and Obama absolutely tanked on job growth. Boy those imports sure piled up though. H1-B’s grew.

And the jobs that were created here, service sector. The lowest paying jobs around, grew. Isn’t that special.

Rich? Poor? Come on Ted, you can do better than that. Sheesh!


26 posted on 01/21/2015 5:55:34 PM PST by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IllumiNaughtyByNature
Why don’t any links to Vox require the same type of labeling that SATIRE posts do?

I wish it did. I had no idea what Vox was until I read the FR comments.

27 posted on 01/21/2015 5:58:23 PM PST by CAluvdubya (<------- has now left CA for NV, where God and guns have not been outlawed! Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There’s a HUGE difference between Warren and Cruz. Warren wants the government, ran by her and her ilk, running the economy. They have theirs and they want the door shut behind them for anyone else to gain success. Her plan, the progressive plan, is to tear everyone down to the same level of misery begging for table scraps from Warren’s table.

Cruz would much rather make it an economy where barriers to success, placed by the government, are removed. Giving people ‘free’ stuff like we have been doing since LBJ has proven to be a failure every single time.


28 posted on 01/21/2015 5:58:52 PM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The left and the right are talking about a different set of one percenters.
The left think they mean filthy rich capitalist industrialists.
The right means the filthy rich political oligarchs.

29 posted on 01/21/2015 6:03:06 PM PST by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Cruz is hitting Barry over the head about the crony capitalism involving all the TARP and Stimulus money handed out to Obummer donors and fellow travelers who have raked in millions while average Americans have either lost their jobs or are working longer and harder for the same amount of money (or less).

That is not free enterprise, but government picking winners and losers.

Smart move by Cruz.


30 posted on 01/21/2015 6:03:33 PM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well, the truth is that under Obama the 1% are becoming FILTHY rich while the rest of us are losing ground. AT 66 I had to go back to work to keep our head above water, and if the government defaults, there goes my SS and annuity. everything gone in one fell swoop. This will not affect those who have their wealth in offshore accounts, which is legal. It won’t affect those who have their money tied up in other assets that will get even better in a collapse. The rich will buy the rest of us off in easy pickings because we won’t have the wherewithal to keep up mortgage and utility, car payments, purchase food, etc. We’ll be looking for a bridge to sleep under, or an overpass to beg at. The filthy rich will continue to be that. I don’t care about that. We cannot let this conquer our hearts. We were naked coming into the world and will leave with nothing. Our treasures are in heaven. However, there is nothing wrong with stating the facts as they are, and they concern a lot of people. I worked hard, but if God sees to take it away, then He will provide in some way.

Cruz’s point was that under Obama and in SPITE OF his rhetoric about the rich getting richer, etc., we know that he is only using it as a tool to drive a wedge. Cruz is stating it as a fact. It is true, but Obama wants people to hate others because of it. He knows that these 1%ers are NOT in harms’ way, really. But, he gets the anarchists panties in a wad. Then they attack those who are not the 1%, but are more accessible to the anarchists. So, anybody in the class that makes over 100K per year are targets, which puts them at personal and economic risk all the way around. They don’t have the real money to have the safety nets in place that the filthy rich have, but the fact that they are wealthier than the average neighbor makes them look like the 1% to those locally who don’t understand any of this.

Personally, I’m glad that it is more than Warren who is sounding the alarm. I’m not sure that Warren’s purposes are pure, but I know that Cruz’s are. She is probably running for office and she is going to do it smartly. If she is right, and the only one saying these things, she is an automatic shoe-in come November 2016. There needs to be someone from our side sounding the alarm. We cannot let the democrats own the narrative for 2016.


31 posted on 01/21/2015 6:03:49 PM PST by Shery (Pray for righteousness to be restored and for the peace of Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“The economy grew by 5 per cent in the third quarter.”
________________________________________________________

BS. At least 4% of this “increase” is due to the much higher cost of Obamacare premiums that are replacing the so-called “bad apple” (i.e., much better) policies.


32 posted on 01/21/2015 6:05:51 PM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (Everytime the cash register rings in a gun store, a Founding Father gets his wings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The top 1% is the permanent political class, and they favor leftist ideology. Cruz gets it.


33 posted on 01/21/2015 6:09:12 PM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ...

Back at the Cromnibus dustup, the Partisan Media Shills were calling her visionary and calling him a loose cannon. The approach has changed, but the intent is the same.

Salon is still on the old meme:

Joan Walsh - State of the GOP is broken: I thought Joni Ernst was bad. Then I watched Ted Cruz
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/gop/3249317/posts


34 posted on 01/21/2015 6:20:31 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Cruz was definitely striking out at Obama’s social corporatist agenda. Obama’s ‘friends’ do well. These are the captains of industry or are made the captains through sweetheart deals (Solyndra).

They are better than the rest of us serfs, and are our ubermensch. /sarc


35 posted on 01/21/2015 6:27:19 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shery

DH and I are 1 percenters. Barely. We are far from getting filthy rich. After paying 6 figures in taxes and being told we are not paying our fair share yet, I have to pay college tuition and now grad school tuition for 2 kids (no financial aid for you, you’re rich) and a nanny for the grandchild I’m raising. That leaves very little at the end of the month. I’m grateful I can provide for my family, but this filthy rich 1 percenter drives a honda and shops at Kohls. I don’t know how we will afford more taxes, but retirement gets further away every year.


36 posted on 01/21/2015 6:29:28 PM PST by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD

If you are struggling that much, you’re probably not in the 1%, regardless of what the homeless panhandlers shout at you.


37 posted on 01/21/2015 6:43:43 PM PST by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
RE:”CRUZ: Because the facts are, we’re facing a divided America right now when it comes to the economy. It is true that the top 1 percent are doing great under Barack Obama. Today, the top 1 percent earn a higher share of our national income than any year since 1928.
He continued by citing wage stagnation, Americans dropping out of the workforce, and even said that the “rich and powerful” have gotten “fat and happy”:

Last week Retroplex replayed the 1960s classical version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

They put a pod next to the bed and the person appears the next day with a completely different personally.

What really sounds crazy is Romney trying to talk about income inequality, come on Mitt. Anyone stupid enough to believe you shouldnt be allowed to vote.

38 posted on 01/21/2015 6:52:56 PM PST by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ted Cruz is right. Obama has managed to get the unemployment figures down by dint of systematically discouraging so many people from seeking jobs or encouraging them to get on welfare. Since the unemployment figures do not include those who are not a actively seeking jobs, it’s easy to cynically get the unemployment figures down if you are an American hating communist like Obama. The only figures that matter are the total number of people in active employment, which today is less than when Obama assumed power 6 years ago, despite a much higher population today.


39 posted on 01/21/2015 6:55:18 PM PST by SmokingJoe ( "Ted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

SSDI is the new, long-term unemployment insurance.


40 posted on 01/21/2015 6:56:51 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson