Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AirAsia 8501 Stall Warnings 'Screaming' Before Crash: Reports
NBC News ^ | 2015/01/21 | NBC News

Posted on 01/21/2015 11:06:32 AM PST by Gideon7

Warning alarms can be heard "screaming" on the cockpit voice recorder of AirAsia Flight 8501 before it crashed, an investigator was quoted as saying Wednesday.

Among the audible alerts is one that indicated the plane is stalling, the investigator told Agence France-Presse (AFP) and the Wall Street Journal. NBC News was immediately unable to confirm the accounts.

The reports come a day after Indonesia's transport minister said the Airbus A320, which crashed last month with 162 people on board, was climbing at an abnormally high rate before it plunged and disappeared from radar.

"The warning [alarms] kept on screaming, and in the background, they [the pilot and co-pilot] were trying to recover the plane," the unidentified investigator told the WSJ. "But what they said wasn't clear." He added that the flight data recorder also indicated that stall warnings were going off.

AFP reported the same claims, citing an investigator from Indonesia's National Transportation Safety Committee, adding that the pilots' voices were drowned out by the sound of the alarms.

Minister Ignasius Jonan told Parliament on Tuesday that radar data showed the doomed jet was climbing at about 6,000 feet a minute before it disappeared on December 28. "It is not normal to climb like that, it's very rare for commercial planes, which normally climb just 1,000 to 2,000 feet per minute," he said. "It can only be done by a fighter jet."


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airasia; airasia8501; airbusa320; aircrash; aviation; blackbox; flight8501; ignasiusjonan; indonesia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
Note: This is a video report

From the description, this crash sounds a lot like the crash of Air France 447 back in 2009. That crash was due to the co-pilot's inexperience with flying the Airbus A300 without the computer. He was confused by the 'Pull up' audible warning going silent whenever the computer faulted at an extreme AOT (the computer shut up because it decided the sensor inputs were crazy). So he kept pulling up the joystick up and up thinking the stall ended whenever the audible warning stopped. Whenever he eased the stick forward the computer reawakened and starting bitching again about a stall. Rinse and repeat. And so he belly-flopped right into the ocean.

And in this new crash the plane shot up like a fighter jet and stalled right into the ocean. Hmm...

In AF447, the other pilot on the right was pushing the joystick forward, but the joystick on the left overrode him, and he didn't realize it. (Boeing uses wheels that are mechanically linked, so pushing one steering wheel forward always pushes the other.) The official determination in the AF crash was pilot error due to failure to understand how the fly-by-wire A300 behaved whenever the computer kicked offline and went into alternate (mostly manual) flight mode.

1 posted on 01/21/2015 11:06:32 AM PST by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

Was this before or after the screaming of Allah Akbar?


2 posted on 01/21/2015 11:08:48 AM PST by Obadiah (If the RINOs engineer the 2016 Primary for their guy, I will sit out the General for my guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

With heavy jets, once a stall occurs, can there be a recovery?


3 posted on 01/21/2015 11:08:57 AM PST by deadrock (I is someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

I remember at the very beginning there was evidence that the plane was flying too slowly, period, which would make a stall even more likely when it started to ascend.


4 posted on 01/21/2015 11:09:37 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Offend a Christian and he is obliged to pray for you. Offend a Muslim and he is obliged to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

I’m not a pilot, but that is the first thing that I thought of.


5 posted on 01/21/2015 11:10:28 AM PST by Gamecock (Joel Osteen is a preacher of the Gospel like Colonel Sanders is an Army officer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deadrock

Denzel Washington did it in the movie “Flight,” so it must be possible. </sarcasm>


6 posted on 01/21/2015 11:10:57 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Offend a Christian and he is obliged to pray for you. Offend a Muslim and he is obliged to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: deadrock

Depends on the altitude.


7 posted on 01/21/2015 11:11:08 AM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: deadrock

Yes. From the bottom of the ocean......................


8 posted on 01/21/2015 11:11:29 AM PST by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

Ok so nobody looks at the airspeed indicator anymore? A huge jet start to shudder in a pre stall and you don’t look at your airspeed? Waaa?


9 posted on 01/21/2015 11:14:26 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deadrock

They were high enough (32,000 ft) to have plenty of time to recover from a stall.


10 posted on 01/21/2015 11:14:50 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Good Muslims, like good Nazis or good liberals, are terrible human beings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: central_va

In the AF447 crash, the pitot tubes for the air-speed incidator iced over and read 0. That’s why the computer kicked offline. It was a storm and they couldn’t the horizon either.


11 posted on 01/21/2015 11:15:47 AM PST by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: deadrock

I’m not absolutely certain, but I believe the answer to that is “Yes”, if the pilots can get the nose down and there’s enough altitude to recover.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_Industrie_Flight_129


12 posted on 01/21/2015 11:16:08 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: deadrock

“With heavy jets, once a stall occurs, can there be a recovery?”

Yup, given they’ve got enough altitude...which they did.

Civilian aircraft are specified to have designs that’ll allow full recovery...it’s only the fighters that’ll bite you back if you don’t sprinkle the magic “stick” dust very early in the stall. (Sort of an exaggeration, but - depending on the A/C, not much.)


13 posted on 01/21/2015 11:16:13 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: deadrock

Of course if you have enough altitude for a recovery.


14 posted on 01/21/2015 11:17:50 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7
"Severe thunderstorms, require much stronger updraft speeds and depend on the type of storm. Multicell lines generally have weaker updrafts than multicell clusters but are arranged in a "curtain". The updraft speeds in a multicell line storm are a bit stronger than the single cell general storm described earlier. Multicell cluster storms often have updraft speeds around 60 MPH in developing components, or about 5,500 feet per minute. This is quite fast, keeping in mind that most general aviation aircraft can only climb up to 3,000 feet per minute (200 Super King Air).

This is also why pilots should NEVER try to "out climb" the top of a developing thunderstorm. The strongest updraft speeds lie with the most intense kind of thunderstorm, the supercell. A supercell is a "continuous cycle" storm, meaning that it has an updraft side and downdraft side at the same time which are separated from each other allowing the storm to last much longer than 30-45 minutes.

The updraft of a supercell also has a broad low and / or mid-level rotation (mesocyclone) which my further boost its speed. Supercell updrafts generally are stronger than 50 MPH, but 70 or 80 MPH is more typical. In the Great Plains of the United States, supercells often produce baseball and grapefruit sized hail (not to mention tornadoes) because of the extreme speeds of the updrafts within. Such updrafts have been known to reach 150 to 175 MPH, or about 12,000 to 15,000 feet per minute!"

http://www.stormtrack.org/forum/archive/index.php/t-716.html
15 posted on 01/21/2015 11:18:03 AM PST by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

Flying without an airspeed indicator is hard but not impossible. GPS can give you ground speed. Pretty close to airspeed if you know the current wind. An iced over A indicator is no reason to die.


16 posted on 01/21/2015 11:20:12 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
So how is it, in this modern age that this can even happen?? You would think that a plane's computers would be programmed to recover from something like this. I would prefer that scenario rather than depend on a hung-over or poorly trained pilot.
17 posted on 01/21/2015 11:21:40 AM PST by Cry if I Wanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I’m not a pilot, but I seem to recall the Airbus disaster a few years ago, where the pilot went to sleep and left the plane in the hands of someone else. Plane went into a stall but for some reason the guy didn’t react, trying “bring the nose up, bring the nose up.” What if you accelerated? Wouldn’t that bring you out of the stall? I mean you’re flying like a rock. How do you get the nose up or down unless you accelerate and therefore create some air resistance or wouldn’t the acceleration change the airplanes angle?

Secondly, recorder said plane climbed 6000 ft in one minute. Was that an updraft causing that?


18 posted on 01/21/2015 11:23:13 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

That sounds like AF447. The captain was indeed sleeping at the time, then he came in and asked the co-pilot WTF was going on.


19 posted on 01/21/2015 11:24:40 AM PST by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

Right and the pilot on the right thought he had control when the guy on the left did.

What could they have done differently. I need to know incase I’m in that situation.


20 posted on 01/21/2015 11:26:44 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson