Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I have my issues with current naval strategy semicolon however, ships of ww2, for the most part, had much more close in fire power than ships of today have. We built FFGs, DDGs,CGs, and especially support ships that has very little fight in them inside of 5 miles. And yes I haven’t forgotten about the Phalanx.


11 posted on 01/20/2015 3:01:44 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan

Note to self: voice command dictation doesn’t punctuate correctly.


12 posted on 01/20/2015 3:03:40 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan

At some level, I hope someone in the Navy is thinking about alternatives to the current carrier-based mega ships. This was a great strategy for WWII, but that was over 70 years ago. Longer range, heavier weapons like nuclear tipped hypersonic cruise missiles could potentially wipe out a carrier with a single strike. A carrier represents too much capital wrapped up in one platform.


16 posted on 01/20/2015 4:12:47 AM PST by Flick Lives ("I can't believe it's not Fascism!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson