Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Wants The Death Tax Increased to 60 Percent, More Taxes on College Savings
townhall.com ^ | 1/19/15 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 01/19/2015 12:21:35 PM PST by Nachum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: Noamie

I am watching that like a hawk to be sure. We will probably be called a racist or elitist for actually saving something up. All our fault I guess.
It seems to be the way the US is heading for sure. Nothing belongs to those who have worked for it.


61 posted on 01/19/2015 2:58:51 PM PST by vpintheak (Keep calm and Rain Steel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Qwackertoo

Sorry, but wine will not be strong enough to make the pain go away...Think in the 150 proof range...


62 posted on 01/19/2015 3:06:31 PM PST by Delta Dawn (Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

I guess all these filthy rich democrats (BO included) somehow exempt themselves from these estate taxes for their heirs. Why else would they go along with this confiscation insanity. I swear it’s almost like Obama is just trying to piss people off-republicans and democrats-on purpose. He is such a little punk.


63 posted on 01/19/2015 3:22:41 PM PST by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Hey! Congressional Republican ‘conservatives’!

Obama will surely compromise at 50%!


64 posted on 01/19/2015 3:28:31 PM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
Agree, but my point was that the change is in the cost basis and that's where the issue lies. For example, when I purchased my first house, it was the late 70's. I paid nearly 80K. If I still held that house and passed it on, it would have a value of 380K today.

So far, so good - under the present laws, my inheritors value it ar 380K, sell it and that's it, no capital gains tax. Or sell it for 350K and take a loss.

Under this proposal, as I read it, they sell it for 380 and pay capital gains tax on 300K (paid 80, sold for 380). Sounds fair except....

That 80K I spent in 1977 has a value today of a lot more than 80K. Where's the adjustment for inflation on the intital purchase? 80K in 1977 was a lot of money, a brand new car was 3 or 4 thousand dollars. Heck, a new Cadillac DeVille was under 10K. So that 80K then is like 250K today. Without inflation adjustments it's not a true cost basis.

This will affect thoise who have no knowledge of estate planning.

65 posted on 01/19/2015 3:35:21 PM PST by par4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Delta Dawn

Two big bottles. I might start early. Tonight. With all the news reports of what he is gonna say with a few “surprises”.

Geez. We’ve worked very hard. Saving for our kids college since the day they were born, one in college and one headed there come Fall 2015. We also want to leave them a little something when we’re gone. Same as our parents who are getting up there in years. And greedy government wants to get their paws all over it. We’re not rich. But we’ve worked extremely hard for the savings and wealth we do have.

And the GOP won’t or can’t fight. They roll over and play dead. The scales have tipped. And they are winning and taking everything they can.


66 posted on 01/19/2015 3:47:08 PM PST by Qwackertoo (Worst 8 years ever, First Affirmative Action President, I hope those who did this to us SUFFER MOST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: par4

Well, my 79 yr old father is selling his house by March 2015 to one of my nephews. Then he is kicking in 1/3 the cost of a new big house my sister and her husband are buying (they will be paying cash as soon as their current home sells) and he’s moving in with them. His will shall be re-written to reflect that deduction from her final 25% share of his estate. Guess he will barely beat them at their wealth/estate grabbing venture. My Mother has already passed and while he is still fairly good health, it is a preemptive move on their part . . . I live almost 1K miles away and help when I can and when needed.


67 posted on 01/19/2015 3:51:23 PM PST by Qwackertoo (Worst 8 years ever, First Affirmative Action President, I hope those who did this to us SUFFER MOST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Vultures!


68 posted on 01/19/2015 3:58:43 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qwackertoo
What a crook. Guess he needs all that tax money to pay for his amnesty and free community college Santa Claus programs.

Yup. Nothing is "free". He already jacked up the capital gains tax from 15 percent to 23.5 percent, of which 3.5 percent goes towards paying for Obamacare. Shell games all around to give our money (the "free" money) to Obama's sons. And inheritance tax used to be under capital gains until Obama separated it out and jacked it up previously. What a crook, exactly!

69 posted on 01/19/2015 4:18:50 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Qwackertoo
Unless I stop at the store today for a bottle of wine.

I'd need a bottle of vodka!

70 posted on 01/19/2015 7:17:58 PM PST by Antoninus II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jdege

We have yet to test the new Congress. I would not be so sure, just yet.


71 posted on 01/19/2015 7:27:17 PM PST by SgtHooper (Anyone who remembers the 60's, wasn't there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: par4
Under this proposal, as I read it, they sell it for 380 and pay capital gains tax on 300K (paid 80, sold for 380). Sounds fair except....

Doesn't sound fair at all if the parent's estate exemption exists and is above 380K. Why not? Because it's not an exemption at all.... the inheritors don't pay unless they sell, but if they do, they pay the same tax as if there was no estate exemption.

To your other point, which is I think your main one, yeah, capital gains should be indexed for inflation. Otherwise (estate issues aside) you are taxed for inflation... you pay for the privilege of keeping up in nominal terms. Inflation is a bad enough tax on savings as it is.

This proposal is Soooo Bad... it doesn't even sound good first time around. Many of Obumbler's other ones sound good... at first... like the $2500 you'd save on health insurance, haha.

72 posted on 01/20/2015 12:36:23 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson