America can do much better and if some insane reason he is the GOP nominee, he will guarantee the Republican party will become a party of the whigs.
Worked for Arlen “turncoat” Spector didn’t it?
Mittens will run for Obama’s third term.
That won’t get him the GOP nomination.
Maybe El Jefe Jeb can out-liberal him for the centrist vote.
His niece is on the RNC now.
This is great news. Let him, Christie and Jeb fight for the left and moderate vote. Then let Walker and Cruz fight for the conservative vote.
This is exactly what we need more liberals running for the nomination to water down their vote.
It’s called Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich, and Rick Santorum, performed so terribly, that they pretty much let Romney win by default. Scott Walker and Ted Cruz are a different story. Why do we care about a dead horse so much?
“Mitt Romney’s election plan is a little bizarre; he plans to run as a Democrat.”
Pardon me, but isn’t this virtually true for all the so called Republicans that have announced to this point?
Since Fauxcahontas Warren and Slick Willie’s wife are going to follow in the Kenyan’s footsteps and run as communists, this may work for Romney.
His argument is correct and very conservative, and moreover easily supported by the daily experience of most Republican voters.
The middle class has indeed suffered as a result of the corporatist, crony capitalist, big government regulatory, immigration, and financial policies of the last 30 years.
Not that he should run; he is a poor politician and not the most credible guy to make this argument work.
Better candidates should have a look at this rhetorical approach however.
ping
Romney is a classic Massachusetts liberal.
“a plan to lift people out of poverty”
As in far more larger government to hand out more free sh**.
I don’t mind the rich getting richer, but there needs to be more of the middle class getting richer, and the poor getting jobs. Three things that are not going to make that happen are amnesty, Obamacare and bigger government.
what is this, Ground Hog Day??
He ought to become a democrat... look who he’s running against on that side... a silly woman who’s running based on her husband being ‘cool’ (to MSM types) and a fake Indian who lied to get advantage ...) Romney needs to change parties and run on that side...
Okay...removing the fact that it is “Romney”, does anyone actually see anything in the comments he’s quoted as saying that match the headline and commentary of this article? In effect, the quotes indicate that liberal policies achieve the opposite of their stated intent and is simply stating the facts of what Obama’s policies have done in reality. How is that “running as a Democrat”?