I tend to agree — it’s not a popular idea around here, and I understand why, but sadly we aren’t going to return back to national sanity for a long time to come — getting the state out of marriage entirely is probably our best bet at this point.
Interesting concept, getting the state out of marriage. Interesting because why should the state actually have to “approve” a living arrangement/religious ceremony. Does the state give Baptism licenses or birth licenses or death licenses (not writs of execution inclusive). Having the state give fag unions a writ of legitimacy is ridicules IMO and in fact when they do they make it a socially approved behavior, not the divient species destructive behavior it is it only encourages such behavior. Perhaps we need redo all our laws especially in the tax and welfare areas which provide benefits based on unions. I bet that happens and the onus for these “unions” goes away.
Getting the state out of marriage would also force serious social security reform.