The USSC found that women have a constitutionally protected right to privacy, and that abortion falls under the right to privacy.
We may all agree that abortion has nothing to do with privacy, but that's how they ruled.
Activist justices wrongly established the so-called right to have an abortion outside the framework of the Constitution as per the following explanation.
Note that neither of the words “privacy” or “abortion” are constitutional terms. But as I indicated in my previous post, the states would have to amend the Constitution to expressly protect both privacy and abortion, imo, in order for the Supremes to be able to apply such enumerated rights to the states via the 14th Amendment.
But with all due respect to mom & pop, as a consequence of parents not making sure that their children are being taught the differences between legislative and judicial powers, the activist justices who decided Roe v. Wade got a free pass to do the following. They were able to pull the wool over the eyes of clueless state lawmakers and citizens by wrongly politically “amending” the so-called Democrat-favoring, vote-winning “rights” to privacy and abortion to the Constitution from the bench.