False comparison. (as usual with you pot nutters.) Peanuts are a useful food source for many people (It has actual real-world positive benefits as a food stuff, unlike pot) while those allergic are in the extreme minority.
Pick something that is utterly F***ing useless to consume, and which ruins about 15+ percent of the population that tries it, and then you might have an apt comparison.
Apart from that Subway stopped selling Peanut butter cookies for precisely the reason that it causes severe allergic reactions in some people. As a company which wants to avoid liability, I grasp their reasons for doing so.
Peanuts are just part of the picture; "As many as 15 million people have food allergies." (http://www.foodallergy.org/document.doc?id=194)
Pick something that is utterly F***ing useless to consume
So government gets to decide what's "useful"? Bootlicker.
Apart from that Subway stopped selling Peanut butter cookies for precisely the reason that it causes severe allergic reactions in some people.
I fully support every business' right to not sell whatever it chooses to not sell: pot, peanuts, you name it.