You want to know the really sad part? Out of all the Republican nominees since Reagan — Bush included — Romney was probably the best. And that’s saying something really, really bad.
I don't know yet for whom I will vote in the 2016 TN primary, but you can be sure that I will vote in the general election for whoever is our nominee.
I'll be damned if I will sit at home or vote for some third party candidate who has no chance whatsoever and therefore hand Hillary or Fauxtahona Warren the victory over. It will not happen, and if I have to hold my nose, so be it. It wont be the first time
Wrong. It's saying something really, really false.
Bush never said that two gay men "who love each other" have a "right" to adopt children (i.e. that government has a moral obligation to force adoption agencies to cooperate out of respect for those "rights").
Bush never said that if a minor teen is pregnant and her parents refuse consent for her to have an abortion, that the teen has a "right" to get a judge to over-rule them.
Bush never said "Any carbonplan has to be world-wide in scope ... let's have a world-wide solution NOT an American one ...."
Romney SAID all those things, every one of them, and it is on record. So your claim that Romney was somehow a "better" bad option than Bush, is flat out NUTS.
Bush was bad. Romney was OFF THE TABLE. It's why I and millions of fellow American patriot conservatives snubbed him in 2012 and Thank God the bastard LOST. May he lose again in 2016 if he gets the nomination.
Romney was the worst, not the best, he was far to the left of anyone who has ever reached such a level in GOP politics.
Romney left the GOP because of Reagan, he eventually became a democrat supporter, fund raiser and voter.
Romney is too left to be called a rino.