Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
The “bear” died decades ago, Russia is a shadow of it’s old military power. War would merely quickly destroy the remaining Russian military and leave them unable to defend themselves against the East and internal secession. Why would they do that, instead of simply lightening up and lay off the invasions, and get back to trade??

Hey FRiend... yeah, I'm serious.

Yes, they are a shadow of their former selves. Reagan's masterful play took care of that.

My point is that "they" are not going to behave rationally as long as "they" are in the control of Putin, who will do anything to cling to power.

This is not about a nation acting in its best interest. It is about the power of a nation controlled by a single person acting in his best interest.

I believe we should apply relentless pressure to them to reduce their power an influence further.

But I also believe that a desperate tin pot dictator can create a lot of damage - there is no "they" in Russia now, only central control. They are weak, but still dangerous.

No offense intended, just some thoughts.

34 posted on 01/09/2015 8:39:51 PM PST by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: MV=PY

That is why I asked if you think he is insane, who would he war against?

If he forces NATO to fight him, we would decapitate his military pretty quickly,leaving Russia open to breakup and the loss of territory in the East, and slipping into vastly lower status, would Putin want to do that to Russia, as his last gesture and his legacy?


35 posted on 01/09/2015 8:44:40 PM PST by ansel12 (Civilization, Crusade against the Mohammedan Death Cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson