Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Momentum builds in Congress for raising the federal gas tax - "in thoughtful way"
The Hill ^ | January 9, 2015 | Laura Barron-Lopez and Keith Laing

Posted on 01/09/2015 4:13:04 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

Record-low gas prices across the U.S. have given rise to fresh talk in Washington of raising the federal gas tax for the first time in over 20 years, with leading Republicans now saying a hike must not be ruled out.

The GOP has long resisted calls from business leaders and others to boost the 18.4 cent-per-gallon tax as a way pay for upgrades to the nation’s crumbling roads and bridges.

Yet in recent days, senior Senate Republicans have said they want to keep options open and that "nothing is off the table" when weighing the best mechanisms to pay to finance infrastructure projects.

"I just think that option is there, it's clearly one of the options," said Sen. Inhofe (R-Okla.), new chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Senate Finance Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), the third-ranking Senate Republican, also said they were open to the possibility of raising the tax.

Democratic leaders in both chambers of Congress, meanwhile, declared this week that “now is the time” for an increase.

While major obstacles stand in the way — namely the House of Representatives —business groups believe there is a real chance to raise the tax in the final two years of the Obama administration.

“Comments this week from Sens. Inhofe, Hatch and Thune signal a growing recognition that the gas tax is a fair and consistent way to fund our infrastructure needs,” Association of Equipment Manufacturers spokesman Michael O’Brien said in an interview on Thursday.

Democrats have typically been more open to the idea of hiking the gas tax, but it’s the shift in Republicans' tone that is drawing more attention to the possibility.

Inhofe argues lawmakers "don't have a choice" but to consider raising the gas tax, which he says is more accurately called a "user fee" — a characterization the founder of the conservative Americans for Tax Reform, Grover Norquist, has yet to sign off on.

Americans for Tax Reform said it is still opposed to the idea of increasing the gas tax, despite the recent decline in fuel prices.

“Before Congress even thinks about asking Americans to pay higher prices at the pump, it should make sure that the $33 billion the federal government collects annually from drivers is spent efficiently,” the anti-tax group said in a statement that was provided to The Hill.


The tax reform group, however, did not say whether it would consider a gas tax hike this year a violation of its anti-tax pledge, which is signed by almost every Republican in the nation who runs for federal office.

Inhofe said he has a response to those who may pushback against considering the fee as a viable option.

"I remind my conservative friends, and people who ask the question about maybe as a part of a package having to increase the user fees, that this is what we are supposed to be doing," Inhofe told The Hill in a brief interview.

"The user fee is very, very popular. The evidence of that is a lot of states are doing that on their own because 'well if the federal government won't do it we've got to do something about the roads,'" Inhofe said.

Thune (R-S.D.) isn't outright for raising the tax, but stuck by comments he made during an interview with "Fox News Sunday, saying "we have to look at all options."

Thune noted that he doesn't think a proposal to increase the tax would garner enough votes in Congress, "unless it's done in the context of the broader tax reform debate."

"That is not my preference for how to fix this infrastructure issue," Thune added.

But if its floated, he said "you would you have to reduce taxes somewhere else, you'd have to provide some tax relief."

Similarly, Hatch (R-Utah) said that some Republicans could be enticed to back a gas tax increase if it was paired with tax cuts elsewhere.

"Personally, I think we're going to have to change the rhetoric on that," Hatch said Thursday.

"People who use the highways ought to pay for them," Hatch added. "That's a small price to pay to have the best highway system in the world. And that may be where we're going to have to go."

A transportation industry source told The Hill that the comments from lawmakers indicated a new willingness to consider increasing gas taxes were one of “a few significant things that happened” that happened recently.

“Most obviously, the price of gas and oil is likely to stay low for a long time, giving lawmakers some leeway to act on this,” the source said. “Even hardcore conservatives like Inhofe realize we need a long-transportation bill and that temporary patches are not helping.”

Transportation advocates have noted that the Obama administration has been leery to get behind a gas tax increase, even as it has pushed Congress for years to pass a new long-term transportation bill.

Obama’s former Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, a Republican, has come out in favor of a gas tax hike, but only after he left the administration in 2013. Obama has argued that lawmakers should fund transportation projects other way, pushing instead for a corporate tax reform package that has gone nowhere on Capitol Hill.

The industry source said Obama’s reluctance to embrace a gas tax could actually help its prospects on Capitol Hill this year, however.

“It’s politically difficult because [the Obama administration] hasn’t gone out on a ledge, but you could make any argument that if he came out in favor of this, it would doom it,” the source said. “I don’t think if a fully-funded highway bill came to his desk, he would veto it.”

Republican congressional campaigns have meanwhile already signaled that they will attack lawmakers who support increasing the gas tax.

“The year just started and Democrats already want to raise taxes,” National Republican Congressional Committee spokeswoman Katie Prill said in a statement.

And House Republicans may not be as open to the idea as their Senate counterparts.

"My guess is there's far more interest in the Senate than there is in the House," said Rep. Kevin Brady (Texas), a senior Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee.

Asked about the idea during a news conference Thursday, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said, “I’ve never voted to raise the gas tax,” though he did not expressly rule out supporting one in the future.

“A highway bill is critically important,” Boehner continued. “It’s a priority for this year. How we’ll fund it ... We are going to have to work our way through this.

Sen. Rob Portman shared that sentiment, telling The Hill a gas tax hike isn't likely.

"I don't even see a gas tax increase happening," Portman said, instead saying a reform to calculating the gas tax could be an option.

The gas tax, which predates the development of the Interstate Highway System by nearly two decades, has been the primary source for federal transportation projects since its creation in the 1930s.

Receipts from the gas tax have been outpaced by transportation expenses by about $16 billion annually in recent years as construction costs have risen and cars have become more fuel efficient.

The current level of federal spending on transportation is about $50 billion per year, but the gas tax only brings in about $34 billion annually at its current rate.

Transportation advocates have argued that increasing the gas tax for the first time since 1993 would be the easiest way to close the gap. Lawmakers’ reluctance to ask drivers to pay more at the pump has doomed previous attempts to increase the gas tax.

Congress has instead turned to other areas of the federal budget in recent years to close the gap. However, critics say the temporary bandages are contributing to a weakened national infrastructure.

Congress had a chance to pass a multi-year transportation funding package last year, but lawmakers could not agree on a way to pay for more than a couple of months’ worth of projects, resulting in a temporary extension that lasts only until May 2015.

The nearly $11 billion measure, which reauthorized the collection of the gas tax but did not increase it, was intended only to prevent a bankruptcy in the Department of Transportation’s Highway Trust Fund.

The trust fund had been scheduled to run out of money in September without congressional action.

Prior to the decline in gas prices, transportation advocates had suggested that the recently completed lame-duck session would have been the best time for lawmakers to raise the gas tax, because it would be more politically viable.

However, lawmakers showed little appetite for tackling the proposed hike before they wrapped up the 113th Congress.

Things appear different in the 114th, if Senate Minority Leader Dick Durbin's (D-Ill.) comments are any indication.

"I think now is the time to do it, but we ought to do it in a thoughtful way."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: biggovernment; energy; gasoline; tax; taxation; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Dusty Road
They are seeing an almost 50% drop in revenue.

After seeing a 100 percent increase, and more, over the past few years.

21 posted on 01/09/2015 5:16:16 AM PST by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Record-low gas prices across the U.S.

Only "record low" for the period of the 0bama regime. Gas was $1.50 when the kenyan commie came to power.

And where is the "momentum" for higher taxes coming from? I seriously doubt it is coming from those that pay the taxes. Most likely from the leeches that form the "dem core constituents" who pay NO taxes. Gas prices won't be low forever and when they go back up, the taxes won't go away.

22 posted on 01/09/2015 5:16:57 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (OK. Now How many votes do we need to IMPEACH and REMOVE the bastard?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
well it certainly didn't take long for the new GOP Congress to be as useless as the old

This doesn't even make any sense. Lower gas prices mean that people will travel more and many will purchase vehicles that use more fuel. That equates to more taxes collected.

I could see a tax on electric cars to compensate for what they aren't paying in fuel taxes. If that isn't done, those driving traditional vehicles are subsidizing highway costs for them.

23 posted on 01/09/2015 5:31:10 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

I’d settle for useless. This is a literal knife in the back.


24 posted on 01/09/2015 5:37:47 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I’m not so sure raising the gas tax is such a bad idea, as the alternative seems to be GPS Tracking for the purpose of road pricing (i.e., variable-rate tolling).

We DEFINITELY will be getting one or the other...in Texas now, it’s pretty much the second. We don’t “officially” have tracking, but half of our cars have transponders (for toll roads) and the state has readers for those transponders on EVERY HIGHWAY now (including all of the freeways), so you can’t get too far without landing in a searchable database.


25 posted on 01/09/2015 5:40:15 AM PST by BobL (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

“Americans for Tax Reform said it is still opposed to the idea of increasing the gas tax, despite the recent decline in fuel prices.”

Irrelevant. Gas is taxed at 18.4 cents a gallon whether a gallon costs 3 dollars or 1 dollar. If anything, taxes should be lowered since as prices go down, the tax takes a larger chunk away from oil companies, in effect coating jobs.


26 posted on 01/09/2015 5:47:49 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz ("Global Warming is caused by government grants to academics." DJ Taylor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

See this is why the Republicans are a joke. They no longer believe in low taxes too.


27 posted on 01/09/2015 5:49:08 AM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

“If anything, taxes should be lowered since as prices go down, the tax takes a larger chunk away from oil companies, in effect coating jobs.”

The thing is that the Dems (with a lot of Republican help) might just do that...taking it a step further, and simply replace the gas tax with road pricing...or maybe give the states the right to road price...and many states would just LOVE IT.

My family buys about 1,000 gallons of gas a year - my entire federal gas tax is under $200. If they use road pricing Texas will be able to easily increase my cost of driving to $2,000...and I’ll still drive, because there aren’t many options.

But a lot of people on our side will be happy...because there will be “no more gas tax”.


28 posted on 01/09/2015 5:56:10 AM PST by BobL (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

TN RINO gov wants the state of TN to do the same.

GIVE ME A BREAK we have enough crappy poorly planned medians, speed bumps, and wild flowers along the Freeways to last a life time that could be halted, same goes for Welcome Centers. We don’t need new ones.

In rural areas we can’t even get a stinking pot hole fixed, much less a rough road. Memphis and Nashville get the biggest chunk of the $$.


29 posted on 01/09/2015 6:04:37 AM PST by GailA (IF you fail to keep your promises to the Military, you won't keep them to Citizens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Good grief! Let’s not cut SPENDING! Just reach for yet another revenue stream.

Monumental fiscal mismanagement.


30 posted on 01/09/2015 6:45:08 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, “There’s not a dime’s worth of difference between the rats and the gopee.”

Anyone who thinks that conservatives can work within the gopee, has his/her head so far up their rectum that they can barely breathe.


31 posted on 01/09/2015 6:58:03 AM PST by Rum Tum Tugger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Because prices will NEVER go up again, right?


32 posted on 01/09/2015 7:05:06 AM PST by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Well we all just put the GOP back in power and the first thing they do is raise taxes. Why aren’t they putting the Bush tax cuts back into effect?


33 posted on 01/09/2015 7:35:52 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

And, when gas prices are on the rise, just how quickly will those in gov’t propose, and PASS, a REDUCTION in said taxes instead?

Yeah, not holding my breath either. It’s always ‘We need more.’, it’s never ‘We’ll do with less.’


34 posted on 01/09/2015 11:19:34 AM PST by i_robot73 (Give me one example and I will show where gov't is the root of the problem(s).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Read My Lips!



35 posted on 01/09/2015 11:22:11 AM PST by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

The GOP is very rarely useful.
They are actually better when they are just barely in the minority, except when it comes to judicial confirmation (that’s the one time it really helps- when there is a GOP POTUS that is).
In the minority they can afford to be against tax increases blah blah blah.
But when push comes to shove and they are in power, they will always fund the beast.
They have proven it every time, and it won’t change unless States literally seize power back from them. The only other alternative is revolution.


36 posted on 01/09/2015 12:05:52 PM PST by Clump ( the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Oooooohhhhhhhh, in a thoughtful way! Well then it’s ok.


37 posted on 01/09/2015 12:07:06 PM PST by uncitizen (2015 Here we come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Geez. This Nation is in the crapper no matter who is in power.


38 posted on 01/09/2015 4:54:54 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I though we fixed all the crumbling roads and bridges with that trillion dollar stimulus?

How come we have to do it all over again so soon?

39 posted on 01/09/2015 5:20:54 PM PST by Gritty (A new future is to be written, a new American moment, and I'm going to seize it-Obama 12/27/14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson