Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Levin : John Boehner's GOP is NOT a Conservative Party : Hannity 1/7/15
https://www.youtube.com ^ | Jan 7, 2015 | iizthatiiz

Posted on 01/08/2015 6:09:38 AM PST by Whenifhow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Scooter100

What a great response.
It appears you have something of value to offer.
But I doubt it, scooter, at least not before you grow up.


21 posted on 01/08/2015 10:41:36 AM PST by frog in a pot (Will their Long March end with the ballot box or with the federal judiciary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: frog in a pot

Oh, grow up.


22 posted on 01/08/2015 1:00:43 PM PST by Scooter100
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: frog in a pot
Nope. See, this is the problem. Everybody wants to name the child, and you end up with ten names. "Action" sounds like a Prog org. Action for America? Remember. It's also why "Constitution" won't work. The idea--the clear delineation of Republican Establishment and Republican Conservatives.

Observe how hard it is for SC to get rid of Lindsey Graham. They confuse the voters.

It's my opinion that the Democrat love affair with illegal aliens from Central America will lead inevitable to several parties in the US--because these aliens come from a multi-party tradition. Once that happens, "La Raza Revolutionary Party"--we will cease to be a 2-party nation. I'm thinking that might really be a good thing.

23 posted on 01/09/2015 7:21:31 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle; Whenifhow
…this is the problem. Everybody wants to name the child…

There is no such problem here.

We in this thread are similar to the future group that will fight our way out of this trouble, sitting around the table saying, “OK, let’s talk about a suitable name for our organization.”

We here, however, are at a distinct disadvantage because we are deliberating in full view of the general public, some of which hopes we are unsuccessful. That future group will be able to adopt a name after private deliberation, secure it in a legal manner and then present it with a platform.

…will lead inevitable to several parties in the US. I'm thinking that might really be a good thing.

The number of parties will be insignificant, only two (or worse, one) will have the resources to influence the outcome, see the 12th A. As an extension of this point, it can be argued Ross Perot may have caused a loss but, if so, it was by a party that was caught napping.

On the other hand, the significance of a failed political system will be a civil war with substantial suffering and a weakened country vulnerable to foreign threats.

24 posted on 01/09/2015 11:23:00 AM PST by frog in a pot (Will their Long March end with the ballot box or with the federal judiciary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

“Republican Conservative Party” I like it!!


25 posted on 03/03/2015 8:30:50 PM PST by Reagan0704
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reagan0704

And the GOP can be the “Republican Mexican” party.


26 posted on 03/04/2015 5:46:11 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

So right LOL!


27 posted on 03/04/2015 7:57:59 PM PST by Reagan0704
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson