However, the deeper (and therefore far more immediate) issue here remains the fact that you log on every day and get into the same argument with one Catholic or another about their religious beliefs. I was not the first person to point it out on this thread. This is not sane behavior.
Feel free to accuse others of trolling, but its easy to document your habit of going out of your way to pick fights with Catholics, and your logic for doing so is not rational. Your daily posting history speaks for itself: You spend hours and hours (and hours...)on this website, fighting with people you can't see and don't know, and it is effecting you emotionally.
That's the only reason why I am still on this thread. Nothing you or I are saying here on this subject is new or is going to change minds. I'm worried about you, Ansell, as one Christian to another -not the lurkers. Your behavior and what passes for logic in your unhealthy mind speak for themselves. I'd like to see you get help.
If I can be a small part of that, I consider it well worth my time. I think you have more to offer.
Thank you for encouraging me to continue to educate pro-life conservatives.
Some may not know how Clinton defeated Dole, among Catholics “it was 54 percent for Clinton, 38 percent for Republican Bob Dole, and 8 percent for independent Ross Perot. That’s not the whole story. While Clinton ran worse among many voter groups in 1996 than he had in 1992 (including seniors and youth, at opposite ends of the age spectrum), he did better among Catholics: a gain of 2.3 million votes compared with Dole’s gain of 400,000 and Perot’s loss of 3.3 million. Of the 23 states with a Catholic vote above the national average, Dole carried only two: Texas and Colorado. Had Dole run just a little better among Catholics, his supporters surmised, he might well have been elected.”