Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CaptainMorgantown
Oops, I forgot the young Henry. So you are correct. Andrew is 5th and soon to be 6th.

If Charles were to die while Queen Elizabeth is still alive, would that not make Andrew the next in line?

53 posted on 01/04/2015 8:55:17 AM PST by Jess Kitting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Jess Kitting

No.
William follows Charles.


60 posted on 01/04/2015 9:07:12 AM PST by BlueNgold (Have we crossed the line from Govt. in righteous fear of the People - to a People in fear of Govt??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: Jess Kitting

I’m not an expert, but I don’t think that the death of Charles would make any difference. The rule seems to be that the eldest branch of descendents take precedence. So the grandson via the eldest brother, comes before a second brother. And I think they changed the law so that male or female line of descent doesn’t matter anymore.


63 posted on 01/04/2015 9:14:35 AM PST by CaptainMorgantown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson