Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

Control being the key issue, I think.

It was by threatening FCC annihilation of the “news media”/”news talk” that the Obama puppetmasters got the entire system to mock those who pointed out Obama’s usurpation of the White House.

The people who didn’t care that they were Alinsky-ed by the newsmakers are on the net. The regime wants to do to us what they did to the “trusted news media” (cough). I suspect they’ve actually already been doing it for a while now, but if the FCC was totally in charge of the internet they could do it more effectively.

When they’re done, they can literally alter history without anybody to point out what they did. Anybody capable of even considering that reality can be silenced by fiat decree. Just like the IRS, NSA, etc have been doing...


88 posted on 01/05/2015 7:03:03 PM PST by butterdezillion (Note to self : put this between arrow keys: img src=""/ g g)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion
It was by threatening FCC annihilation of the “news media”/”news talk” that the Obama puppetmasters got the entire system to mock those who pointed out Obama’s usurpation of the White House.

Source?

The reason I'm skeptical is that FCC revocation of a broadcast license is a lengthy--and very transparent-- process, involving public hearings and review in the federal courts. I don't think the FCC has revoked a TV license in the last 50 years. And the FCC has no jurisdiction at all over cable TV networks.

91 posted on 01/11/2015 3:21:02 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson