Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norm Lenhart
The parents tried to take the case to the US Supreme Court, but the justices wouldn't hear it. At that point, Bush didn't have options. At least according to this textbook excerpt.

I wasn't trying so much to defend Bush -- he looked weak, and looking weak is what will cost him the election -- as to point out that it's easy for voters and politicians who don't have the responsibility for such decisions to run down his actions.

Generally speaking, politicians -- even those who make a lot of noise about no compromise and no backing off on other issues -- avoid tough cases like this when they are the ones who have answer for their decisions. It's not a sure thing that even whatever politician you like the best would act differently from Bush if they had the authority.

158 posted on 12/29/2014 12:40:20 PM PST by x ("It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: x

Then he uses his authority, places either Guard or private security indemnified by his authority around the building and MAKES the feds act on camera before the world and lets then deal with the fallout.

Let the feds try throwing a sitting Gov in a 10th Amendment dispute into prison.

MAKE THEM TRY. Thats being a leader. And he absolutely had the power to do it as Gov.


159 posted on 12/29/2014 1:02:42 PM PST by Norm Lenhart (1`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson