Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
The fact that Liberal judges and liberal lawyers use this socialist tool to make their legal claims DOES NOT ESTABLISH that stopping drugs is not constitutional.

Your drug war depends on those liberals' view of the Constitution.

For those who believe in the original Constitution, using Wickard to overrule state marijuana regulation is a violation of both the Commerce Clause and Tenth Amendment. You can't weasel out of your support for Wickard, nor your trashing of the Tenth Amendment by claiming the 'defense clause'.

66 posted on 12/27/2014 8:34:50 PM PST by Ken H (What happens on the internet, stays on the internet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Ken H
Your drug war depends on those liberals' view of the Constitution.

No it doesn't, and that you assert that it does demonstrates that you really haven't been listening to what I have been attempting to tell you. I'm wondering if I should just stop trying.

You can't weasel out of your support for Wickard, nor your trashing of the Tenth Amendment by claiming the 'defense clause'.

Just because you say something doesn't make it true. There is no "weasel". I am exactly right. Constitutional Authorization for Drug interdiction derives from the Mandate to defend the nation and not "Wickard". That Liberal judges say otherwise, and that it has become the goto precedent, is immaterial to me.

Here. Educate yourself.

74 posted on 12/28/2014 10:14:54 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson