Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wolf24
I think you can make a pretty good case that Childs is a Thing. He doesn't really account for his whereabouts very satisfactorily. Have a look here: http://www.blastr.com/2011/08/was_childs_the_thing_one.php for example.

Of course, the ambiguity allows you to believe that one, both, or neither is a Thing.

Personally, I believe Mac's "let's see what happens" means he's going to watch Childs, and hen blast him with a hidden flamethrower or something after the credits roll. Just my take.

58 posted on 12/26/2014 8:40:20 PM PST by FredZarguna (I'm gonna take this counter top, and I'm gonna whop you on that side of your face with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: FredZarguna

Nope. Neither were. Remember the blood test? Every part of the thing was a living entity that struggled to survive. What does alcohol do to tissue? Why did Mac seem to relax after Childs took a drink? Because if he was a thing, his mouth tissue, et al., would have reacted against the alcohol. It was all a test by Mac to see if Childs was a thing...


78 posted on 12/28/2014 7:26:12 AM PST by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Hwaet! Lar bith maest hord, sothlice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson