To: lowbridge
The chances of 7 girls becoming pregnant over a five-day trip by having sex once would seem to be impossible. There must have been a lot of sex. How did they have any time to sightsee???
10 posted on
12/22/2014 3:20:12 PM PST by
thefactor
(yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
To: thefactor
The chances of 7 girls becoming pregnant over a five-day trip by having sex once would seem to be impossible. There must have been a lot of sex. How did they have any time to sightsee???
Just couldn’t take their eyes off the church steeples?
19 posted on
12/22/2014 3:25:17 PM PST by
heshtesh
(I believe in Sarah Palin, the rest not so much.)
To: thefactor; Slings and Arrows; MeshugeMikey
The chances of 7 girls becoming pregnant over a five-day trip by having sex once would seem to be impossible. There must have been a lot of sex. How did they have any time to sightsee??? George Costanza rented a movie about this once...
26 posted on
12/22/2014 3:33:52 PM PST by
a fool in paradise
(Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
To: thefactor
“The chances of 7 girls becoming pregnant over a five-day trip by having sex once would seem to be impossible”
Do the math.
Or watch a porn movie.
To: thefactor
Sounds like there was way too much sightseeing of the opposite sex.
48 posted on
12/22/2014 4:15:48 PM PST by
bgill
(CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: thefactor
Depends upon what sights they wanted to see. From the results, we can deduce it wasn’t museums, galleries, and landmarks.
88 posted on
12/22/2014 6:24:09 PM PST by
ApplegateRanch
(Love me, love my guns!©)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson