Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj

I know. Vermont is already RED, as in communist. That is one reason which I think conservatives should be referred to as Blue and Liberals as Red—it’s more consistent that way.


10 posted on 12/21/2014 7:21:54 AM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: rbg81

It’s the media’s fault. They deliberately switched the colors on Election Night 2000 for the parties. Chillingly Orwellian. It’s on us to correct the willful mislabeling at every turn.


11 posted on 12/21/2014 7:24:35 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: rbg81

When the red and blue state terms first appeared on TV pubbie states were blue and dim states were red. We all thought that fit quite well. Especially since the Dim’s are marxists and anti-American. The next election cycle pubbie states were red and dim states were blue. It has been that way since. Coincidence? I don’t think so. Who runs the propaganda media?


15 posted on 12/21/2014 8:01:58 AM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: rbg81

“Vermont is already RED, as in communist. That is one reason which I think conservatives should be referred to as Blue and Liberals as Red—it’s more consistent that way.”

It used to be True Blue for Republicans and Red for democrats, but there were jokes about Red being appropriate for democrats and the media apparently got together, probably at the behest of democrats, and switched True Blue to the democrats and Red to the Republicans.


19 posted on 12/21/2014 8:14:07 AM PST by duffee (Dump the Chairman of the Mississippi Republican Party, joe nosef.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson